Casdagli v Casdagli
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1919 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 1919 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
H v H (Queen's Proctor intervening) (validity of Japanese divorce)
...Bell v Kennedy (1868) LR 1 Sc & Div 307, HL. Boldrini v Boldrini and Martini [1932] P 9, [1931] All ER Rep 708, CA. Casdagli v Casdagli [1919] AC 145, [1918–19] All ER Rep 462, HL. Chaudhary v Chaudhary [1984] 3 All ER 1017, [1985] Fam 19, [1985] 2 WLR 350, [1985] FLR 476, CA. Cramer v Cram......
-
Blue Sky One Ltd v Blue Airways LLC
...2 Foresworn in order to avoid infinite regression or a circularis inexticabilis: see Casdagli v Casdagli [1918] P 89 (per Scrutton LJ); [1919] AC 145 and Re Ross [1930] 1 Ch. 377, 389 per Luxmoore ...
-
Neilson v Overseas Projects Corporation of Victoria Ltd
...as renvoi laws; ie laws that define the scope of the lex causae's choice of law rules. She relies on a dictum of Scrutton LJ in Casdagli v Casdagli25. His Lordship said that, where the choice of law rules of the lex causae require the application of the lex fori, the lex fori: ‘may well app......
-
Harding v Commissioner of Taxation
...ambitions, health, hopes and projects … [are] all considered as keys to his intention to make a home in England”: Casdagli v Casdagli [1919] AC 145 at It follows that there is no incongruity in a person physically living permanently in another country whilst retaining at all times an Austra......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
The Requisite Intention for the Acquisition of Domicile of Choice: Permanent or Indefinite – A Comparative Perspective
...in Re Montizambert Estate [1973] O.J. No. 1035 (QL) (Ont. SC (H.C.J.)) arising from the analysis by Lord Atkinson in Casdagli v Casdagli [1919] AC 145 at 178 of the House of Lords decision in Winans v AG, supra note 35. is the Court has to delve into the deceased's mind and while the propos......