Cassel v Riverside HA

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1992
Year1992
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 cases
  • Wells v Wells
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 23 October 1996
    ...the rest of the damages. However, there was no challenge to the principle of their recovery. See Cassell v Riverside Health Authority [1992] PIQR Q168, CA. See also Futej v Lewandowski [1980] 124 Sol J 777, per Edwin Jowitt QC sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge, where the court awarded ......
  • Thomas v Brighton Health Authority
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 7 November 1995
  • James Robshaw (a child by his mother and Litigation Friend Suzanne Adams) v United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 1 April 2015
    ...the Courts have previously been persuaded that a home pool is reasonably required." I was reminded of the following cases: (i) Cassel v Riverside Health Authority [1992] PIQR Q168 (where a claim for a hydrotherapy pool by a claimant with cerebral palsy was refused on the basis that it was n......
  • Brian Muyepa v Ministry of Defence
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division
    • 21 October 2022
    ...which is sought to be addressed should be addressed as part of a Claimant's general damages for loss of amenity. In Cassell v Riverside [1992] PIQR Q168 the trial judge allowed the cost (£32,000) of building a swimming pool. This decision was overturned by the Court of Appeal, Purchas L.J. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT