Cassels v HM Advocate
| Jurisdiction | Scotland |
| Neutral Citation | 2006 SCCR 327 |
| Year | 2006 |
| Date | 2006 |
| Court | High Court of Justiciary |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
C.j.m. V. Her Majesty's Advocate
...considered and detailed untruths as opposed to it being a 'spontaneous impetuous outburst' which would be inadmissible (Cassells v HMA 2006 SCCR 327)". [10] It was accepted that, when considering a section 275 application, it was necessary for the court to determine at the outset whether th......
-
Cjm V. Her Majesty's Advocate
...in the episode sought to be relied on was to be contrasted with the spontaneous impetuous outburst discussed in Cassels v HM Advocate 2006 SCCR 327. Thomson v HM Advocate 2001 SCCR 162 could also readily be distinguished. The decision of the judge at the preliminary hearing had been unsound......
-
Thomson v HM Advocate [Appeal Court, High Court of Justiciary]
...to: Advocate (HM) v Ronald (No 1)UNK [2007] HCJ 11; 2007 SLT 1170; 2007 SCCR 451; 2008 SCL 160 Cassels v HM AdvocateUNK [2006] HCJAC 20; 2006 SCCR 327 Green v HM AdvocateUNK 1983 SCCR 42 Megrahi (Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al) v HM Advocate sub nom HM Advocate v Al-Megrahi (Abdelbaset Ali) (No 4......
- HM Advocate v Ronald
1 books & journal articles
-
The Scottish “Rape Shield”: As Good as it Gets?
...per Lord Johnston and para 44 per Lord Marnoch. For similar decisions, see also Mackay v HM Advocate 2005 JC 24 and Cassels v HM Advocate 2006 SCCR 327. More recently, the issue in Ronald was the evidence of a consultant psychiatrist that the complainer in a rape case, involving a defence o......