Cattermole v Prisk
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2006 |
| Year | 2006 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
18 cases
-
La Tanya Hughes (Sole Executrix named in the last will and testament of Laban Hughes, deceased) Claimant v Clement Hughes Lawful Attorney of Ena Hughes Defendant [ECSC]
...is to assist in the avoidance of disputes, or at least in the minimisation of their scope." Further, in the case of Cattermole v Prisk [2006] 1 FLR 6939, the will of an elderly and infirm testatrix was upheld despite the failure to observe the 'golden rule'. 52 In looking at the evidence as......
-
Henry Dominic Chicheley Thornton and Others v Mary Virginia Chicheley Woodhouse and Another
...who satisfies himself as to the capacity and understanding of the testator and makes a record of his examination and findings – see Cattermole v Prisk [2006] 1 FLR 693 at [12]) was not applied because it did not apply. (ii) Neither the Will nor the appointment of Susie represented a substan......
-
Carol Frances Gowing v Terence Arthur Ward
...per Templeman J, and subsequently approved in Buckenham v Dickinson [2000] WTLR 1083, Hoff v Atherton [2005] WTLR 99, Cattermole v Prisk [2006] 1 FLR 693 and in Scammell v Farmer [2008] WTLR 1261, paras 117–123. 8 Compliance with the golden rule does not, of course, operate as a touchstone ......
-
Hajna Moss v Michael Moss
...per Templeman J, and subsequently approved in Buckenhan v Dickinson [2000] WTLR 1083; Hoff v Atherton [2005] WTLR 99; Cattermole v Prisk [2006] 1 FLR 693, [2006] Fam Law 98, and in Scammell v Farmer [2008] EWHC 1100 (Ch). at paras 117 to 123. [8] Compliance with the Golden Rule does not, o......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Testamentary Capacity and Intention
...have some influence over the testator. Non-compliance with the golden rule does not mean that the will is invalid. In Cattermole v Prisk [2006] 1 FLR 693, it was observed: This ‘golden rule’ provides clear guidance as to how, in relevant cases, disputes can be avoided, or minimised (with th......