Caudle and Others v Sharp Qbcmf 94/0539 Qbcmf 94/0540

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • Stonegate Pub Company Ltd v Ms Amlin Corporate Member Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 17 October 2022
    ...causal link. In Scott v Copenhagen Re the relevant clause was ‘arising from one event’. It was accepted, in line with Caudle v Sharp [1995] 4 Re LR 389, that ‘arising from one event’ did not necessarily import a requirement of proximate causation. It nevertheless required a significant caus......
  • IRB Brasil Resseguros SA v CX Reinsurance Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 7 May 2010
    ...The Arbitrators in paragraph 80 expressly referred to a different passage in Rix J's judgment, namely at 684 Col 2, to the intent that Caudle v Sharp [1995] Lloyd's Rep 433“suggests … that what may be a relevant event (or … occurrence) must take colour from the contractual context, includin......
  • Axa Reinsurance (UK) Plc v Field
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 20 June 1996 not feature in his Lordship's judgment. 8 Meanwhile, there had taken place in February 1994 the decision at first instance in Caudle v. Sharp [1995] L.R.L.R. 80. Various original insurers arranged 32 run-off contracts of reinsurance with syndicates for whom Mr. Outhwaite was the underwri......
  • Axa Reinsurance (UK) Ltd v Field
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT