Cave v Cave
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1879 |
| Year | 1879 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
26 cases
-
Jones v Registrar of Lands
...A.C. 215; (1954), 98 Sol. Jo. 733, followed. (2) -Assets Co. Ltd. v. Mere Roihi, [1905] A.C. 176, distinguished. (3) -Cave v. CaveELR (1880), 15 Ch. D. 639; sub nom. Chaplin v. Cave, Cave v. Cave, 49 L.J. Ch. 505, followed. (4) -Diplock, In re, Diplock v. WintleELRUNK, [1948] Ch. 465; [1948......
-
P.C.W. Syndicates v, P.C.W. Reinsurers
...and therefore it prevented the possibility of imputing the knowledge of the agent to the principal. 176That was followed by Fry J. In Cave v. Cave (1880) 15 Ch 177I do not find in the authorities any decision that an agent to insure is required by section 19 to disclose information which he......
-
Sinclair Investments (UK) Ltd v Versailles Trade Finance Ltd
...much as on TPL. As a general rule a principal is not fixed with his agent's knowledge where the agent is acting in fraud of the principal: Cave v Cave (1880) 15 Ch D 639; In re Hampshire Land Co [1896] 2 Ch 743; JC Houghton & Co v Nothard Lowe and Wills Ltd [1928] AC 1. It seems to me tha......
- Latec Investments Ltd v Hotel Terrigal Pty Ltd ((in Liquidation))
Request a trial to view additional results