Cawley v Frost

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1976
Year1976
CourtDivisional Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • Min for Justice v Makuch
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 10 May 2013
    ...ROGER v NORMAND 1995 SLT 411 PARKIN v NORMAN 1983 1 QB 92 PUBLIC ORDER ACT 1936 S5 R v WATERS 1963 47 CR APP R 149 CAWLEY v FROST 1976 1 WLR 1207 PUBLIC ORDER ACT 1936 S9(1) PUBLIC ORDER ACT 1936 S9 MIN FOR JUSTICE v SZALL UNREP SUPREME 15.2.2013 2013 IESC 7 CRIMINAL JUSTICE (PUBLIC ORDER) ......
  • Brown v Fisk and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 1 January 2021
  • R v Edwards (Llewellyn)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 3 February 1978
    ...way in which the argument for the Crown has been put by Mr. Thomas is in reliance on two relatively recent authorities: Cawley v. Frost (1976) 1 W.L.R. 1207 and Anderson v. Miller (1976) Cr. L. R. 743. Both exhibit the same principle at work. It is only necesaary to refer to the first of th......
  • Magistracy Appeal judgment no. HCMA193/2012
    • Hong Kong
    • High Court (Hong Kong)
    • 20 July 2012
    ... ... “ The purpose of the Act was to promote good order in places to which the public have access : see Cawley ... Frost ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • A Beautiful Law for the Beautiful Game? Revisiting the Football Offences Act 1991
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 85-5, October 2021
    • 1 October 2021
    ...seated areas. A 2019 report into standing at football in England and Wales found53. Section 4 Public Order Act 1986. See Cawley v Frost [1976] 1 WLR 1207 for its use under the pre-1986 legislation.54. Section 5 Public Order Act 1986.55. Taylor (n 2) para 289.56. Ibid para 301.57. Ibid para ......
  • Recent Judicial Decisions
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles No. 56-1, January 1983
    • 1 January 1983
    ...the actions was immaterial.Thepurpose of the Public Order Act was plainly to promote good orderin a public place: Cawley v. Frost [1976] 1 W.L.R. 1207. Theintention of the person doing the act was immaterial, the likelihoodof disorder is the test. This point distinguishes the earlier sectio......