Cawley v Frost
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1976 |
| Year | 1976 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Min for Justice v Makuch
...ROGER v NORMAND 1995 SLT 411 PARKIN v NORMAN 1983 1 QB 92 PUBLIC ORDER ACT 1936 S5 R v WATERS 1963 47 CR APP R 149 CAWLEY v FROST 1976 1 WLR 1207 PUBLIC ORDER ACT 1936 S9(1) PUBLIC ORDER ACT 1936 S9 MIN FOR JUSTICE v SZALL UNREP SUPREME 15.2.2013 2013 IESC 7 CRIMINAL JUSTICE (PUBLIC ORDER) ......
-
DPP v Francis John Neville
...mention them simply for the record's sake: Knox v Anderton 76 Crim. App. R 156; Buchanan v Motor Insurers Bureau [1955] 1 WLR at 486; and Cawley v Frost [1976] 3 All ER 743. 16 The two decisions which are crucial in the first case are Director of Public Prosecutions v Vivier and Director of......
-
R v Edwards (Llewellyn)
...in which the argument for the Crown has been put by Mr. Thomas is in reliance on two relatively recent authorities: Cawley v. Frost (1976) 1 W.L.R. 1207 and Anderson v. Miller (1976) Cr. L. R. 743. Both exhibit the same principle at work. It is only necesaary to refer to the first of those ......
-
Magistracy Appeal judgment no. HCMA193/2012
... ... “ The purpose of the Act was to promote good order in places to which the public have access : see Cawley ... Frost ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
A Beautiful Law for the Beautiful Game? Revisiting the Football Offences Act 1991
...seated areas. A 2019 report into standing at football in England and Wales found53. Section 4 Public Order Act 1986. See Cawley v Frost [1976] 1 WLR 1207 for its use under the pre-1986 legislation.54. Section 5 Public Order Act 1986.55. Taylor (n 2) para 289.56. Ibid para 301.57. Ibid para ......
-
Recent Judicial Decisions
...the actions was immaterial.Thepurpose of the Public Order Act was plainly to promote good orderin a public place: Cawley v. Frost [1976] 1 W.L.R. 1207. Theintention of the person doing the act was immaterial, the likelihoodof disorder is the test. This point distinguishes the earlier sectio......