Central Argentine Railway v Marwood
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 14 June 1915 |
| Date | 14 June 1915 |
| Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 cases
-
Reardon Smith Line Ltd v Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Agostino Bertani, Cape Rodney, Queen City, Riverton)
...dispersed and could not readily be reassembled. 25 The appellants also placed reliance on ( Central Argentine Railway v. Marwood 1915 Appeal Cases page 981) in support of their argument that each ship individually was entitled to have its contract regarded separately and not in association ......
-
Carboex SA v Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse SA
...each of the questions in the negative. In reaching their decision they relied on the decision of the House of Lords in Central Argentine Railway v Marwood [1915] A.C. 981. In the light of their decision on those two questions they found it unnecessary to consider other preliminary issues wh......
-
Union of India v Compania Naviera Aeolus S.A. (Spalmatori)
...provided that such causes occurred during the time for loading or discharging" they would surely have said so. Thus, in Central Argentine Railway, Limited v. Marwood [1915] A.C.981 the words were: "Time to commence when steamer is ready to unload and written notice given, whether in berth ......
- Carboex SA v Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse SA
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
Construing The Strike Exception In An AmWelsh Charterparty (Update)
...They found that clause 9 was ambiguous and was to be construed contra proferentem, applying Central Argentine Rly Ltd v. Marwood [1915] AC 981. The charterers appealed under s 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (appeal on point of On appeal to the Commercial Court, the newly formulated question......
-
Construing The Strike Exception In An Amwelsh Charterparty
...negative. They found that clause 9 was ambiguous and was to be construed contra proferentem, applying Central Argentine Rly Ltd v Marwood [1915] AC 981. Charterers appealed under s 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (appeal on point of The Commercial Court's analysis On appeal, the newly formul......