Chalmers Property Investment Company v Robson
| Jurisdiction | Scotland |
| Date | 1965 |
| Year | 1965 |
| Court | Court of Session (Outer House) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
Moncrieff v Jamieson and Others
...proprietor had no right to do anything more than lay water pipes on its land. Affirming the decision of both the Lord Ordinary (Kissen), 1965 SLT 381, and the First Division (Lord President Clyde, Lord Guthrie and Lord Migdale), 20 May 1966, unreported, the House held unanimously that the c......
-
Moncrieff v Jamieson and Others
...Allan (Walter D) Ltd,Lady Smith, 4 Aug 2004, unreported Norcott v SandersonUNK 1990 SCLR 622 Robson v Chalmers Property Investment Co Ltd 1965 SLT 381 Russell v CowparUNK (1882) 9 R 660 Sanderson v GeddesUNK (1874) 1 R 1198 Scotland v Wallace 1964 SLT (Sh Ct) 9 Waddell v Earl of BuchanUNKUN......
-
William Grant And Others V. Glen Catrine Bonded Warehouse And Others
...remarks of Lord Kyllachy in British Linen Bank v. Cowan (1906) 8 F. 704 at p. 712. In Robson v. Chalmers Investment Company Limited 1965 S.L.T. 381, however, Lord Kissen was indeed able to find that the respondents' acquiescence had had the effect of barring them from requiring the removal ......
-
James Moncrieff And Another V. Keith Jamieson And Others
...at all, required to amount to an implied grant by actings. Reference was made to Robson v. Chalmers Property Investment Company Ltd. 1965 S.L.T. 381. What the respondents sought was declarator of the real right of servitude (such as would be good against singular successors). Whatever the p......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
From here to eternity: does a servitude road last forever?
...in the deed examined in Gibb v Bruce (1837) 165; 169; Cronin v Sutherland (1899) 2F. 217; Robson v Chalmers Property Investment Co 1965 SLT 381. See generally Cusine & Paisley Servitudes par 14 46. 52 Keith v Texaco Ltd. 1977 SLT (Lands Tr.) 16; Hogg v Campbell unreported, 1993-04-02, Lord ......
-
Scots Law News
...paras 77-82 of his speech and was a judgment of a bench including Lords Reid and Guest. The case was only reported at Outer House level (1965 SLT 381), the later First Division decision (in 1966) also remaining unreported. While the leading modern textbook on servitudes (D J Cusine and R R ......