Chambers v DPP
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1995 |
| Date | 1995 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
14 cases
-
Chee Siok Chin and Others v Minister for Home Affairs and Another
...authority that took a pragmatic and robust view of the applicable legislation. 79 In Chambers v The Director of Public Prosecutions [1995] Crim LR 896, Lexis Nexis CO/3493/1994 (“Chambers’ case”), Keene J pertinently … [counsel] has sought to refer the Court to the White Paper, ‘Review of P......
-
Stephen Peter Gough v DPP
...to his own beliefs. 14 Mr Penny submits that the conduct of the appellant was plainly "disorderly behaviour" within s. 5. He points to Chambers v DPP [1995] Crim LR 896 in which the appellant demonstrators persistently prevented a surveyor from using a theodolite by blocking its infra-red b......
-
DPP v Morrison
...but whether, as the statute provides and the charge set out, it was likely to be caused. Mr John cited Chambers and Edwards v DPP [1995] Crim LR 896, cited in the stated case. 33. As to the second reason, s. 6(4) of the Public Order Act 1986 provides: "(4) A person is guilty of an offence u......
-
Chee Siok Chin and Others v Minister for Home Affairs and Another
...authority that took a pragmatic and robust view of the applicable legislation. 79 In Chambers v The Director of Public Prosecutions [1995] Crim LR 896, Lexis Nexis CO/3493/1994 (“Chambers’ case”), Keene J pertinently … [counsel] has sought to refer the Court to the White Paper, ‘Review of P......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Administrative and Constitutional Law
...the latter, Rajah J agreed (at [79]) with the views of Keene J expressed in Chambers and Edwards v The Director of Public Prosecutions[1995] Crim LR 896 where the judge found that it was of little value to look at the preceding White Paper particularly where the Bill itself underwent signif......
-
Recent Judicial Decisions
...abusive orinsulting, nor that it brought about any feelings of apprehension in the person to whom itwas directed Chambers v DPP [1995] Crim LR 896. The wording of s. 5 is not limited torowdy behaviour and will extend to any behaviour that could be construed as threatening,abusive or insulti......