Le Chancellour & Scholers del University de Oxford v Levesque de Lincoln, Sir Kenelm Digby & Homes
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1657 |
| Date | 01 January 1657 |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
English Reports Citation: 124 E.R. 202
COMMON BANCK AND EXCHEQUER
[192] La chancellour & scholebs del university de oxford versus levesque de lincoln, sib kenelm digby & homes. Le Chancellour & Scholers del University de Oxford portant Quarelmpedit versus le Evesque de Lincoln, Sir Kenelm Digby & Holmes. Et Crawley monstre cause pur que ne admitUs ne serra grant, & il dit que est mise pur positive rule in Fitzh. N. B. LITTLETON, 193. MICH. 4 CAB. IN COMMUNI BANCO 203 37 & 21 E. 3. que ceo ne doet ee grant aprea les 6 mois sont passe, si noti soit pur le Roy. Mes icy les 6 mois sont passe. Henden. Dependant cest suite 1'esglise deveigii voyde pex resignacon ; & voier est, que le 6 moia passe devant ceo fuit move; Mes le reason in Fitz. N. B. & in le Register pur que aprea 6 mois ne serra grant est, pur ceo que donque title est divolve al Evesque per Lapps, mes ou est nul Lapps come in case del Roy lea 6 moia neat regard; & in nostre caae le Ordinary eat fait party al auite, & pur ceo nul Lapps poet ee. Secundment. University que avoit title a presenter sur le Stat de Recusancy no serra ubject al Lapps. Car ila ne serra lie per usurpacon ^ome fuit in un Duncombs Caae. Mes Richardson interrupt luy. Et per luy Hutton & Yelverton ne unque fuit I'eritent del Statute a prender le title del Ordinary & doner al University...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Leach and Others against Thompson
...in possession, 27 Ass. 46. 2 Rolls Abr. 498. Now here the reversioner for life never agreed to take any estate from the first lessee. By Co. Lit. 192, 214, if there be two join-tenants in reversion, a surrender to one enures to both ; by which it is plain, that, as to one moiety, the deed o......
-
Cannan and Grimley, Assignees of Tanner a Bankrupt v Hartley
...to receive the key. [Wilde, C. J. I suppose that is meant to be inferred from the circumstance of the key being retained. Maule, J. In Co. Litt. 192 a. it is said, "If such a lessee (speaking of a lessee under a lease from two joint tenants) for life should surrender & one of- them, it shal......
-
Connolly v Connolly
...Buxton v. BuxtonENR 1 My. & Cr. 80. Hughes v. Williams 12 Ves. 493. Ford v. GreyENR 6 Mod. 45. York v. StoneENR 1 Salk, 158. Eliz.ENR Co. Lit. 192 a. Syme's case Cro. Eliz. 33. Bellingham v. AlsopENR Cro. Jac. 53. Morris v. Barry 1 Wils. 2. Philpott v. DobbinsonUNK 3 M. & P. 320. Williams v......
-
Challoner v Davies
...in possession, though he has a greater term than the lessee of the reversion has, yet he may surrender to the lessee in reversion. Co. Litt. 192 a. and nevertheless the term for years in possession cannot merge in the term in reversion, but is merged in the inheritance. Hutt. 126, and Trspo......