Chant v Aquaboats Ltd
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Year | 1978 |
| Date | 1978 |
| Court | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
McClean vs Simon Community,Jim Dennison
...is not defined. That was deliberate parliamentary policy, because circumstances in the real world vary so widely (Chant v Aquaboats Ltd [1978] ICR 643, [1978] 3 All ER 102, EAT). The expression should not be construed restrictively (Dixon and Shaw v West Ella Developments Ltd [1978] IRLR 15......
-
Mr A Marshall and others v The Doctors Laboratory Ltd: 2203491/2020 and others
...tribunal claims (as all eight had done in the earlier claim about status) as that is about individual rights - Chant v Aquaboats Ltd (1978) ICR 643. It remains that some, perhaps most, of the claimants face uphill work establishing their trade union activity, or that it was at such a level ......
-
McCrossan vs Department for Social
...Nagarajan v London Regional Transport [2000] 1 AC 501 (7) R (E) v Governing Body of JFS [2010] 2 AC 728 (8) Chant v Aquaboats Limited [1978] 3 ALL ER 102 (EAT) (9) Dixon and Shaw v West Ella Developments Ltd [1978] IRLR 151 (10) The Marley Tile Co. Ltd v Shaw [1980] IRLR 25 (11) British Air......
-
Mr B O'Toole and Mr S Rohan v DHL Services Ltd: 1300625/2017
...evidence, and copies of the following authorities: Drew v St Edmundsbury Borough Council [1980] IRLR 459 (EAT); Chant v Aquaboats Limited [1978] ICR 643 Chairman and Governors of Amwell View School v Dogherty [2007] ICR 135 (EAT), British Waterways Board (t/a Scottish Canals) v Smith (UK EA......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Whistleblowers and Job Security
...Act 1992 (TULRCA)). It is well established that individual actions without union involvement are not covered: Chnr v Aquaboars Lrd [1978] ICR 643. Of course, the situation might be different if the employee was a shop steward who had express union support for whistleblowing outside working ......