Chapman v Oakleigh Animal Products Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1970 |
| Year | 1970 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
Hill-Cross v Bermuda Hospitals Board
...to do. 19 I was referred to a couple of other cases involving injuries caused or contributed to by an employee's horseplay. In Chapman v Oakleigh Animal Products (1970) 8 KIR 1063; [1970] EWCA Civ J0421–1 the plaintiff, who was 16 years old, was working at the defendant's factory during the......
-
Muhandiramge (section S-LTR.1.7)
... ... Indeed, this has been described as the “ golden rule ”: see Chapman v Oakleigh Animal Products [1970] 8 KIR 1063 , at 1072. This general rule ... ...
-
Hill-Cross v Bermuda Hospitals Board
... ... Aldred v NacancoUNK [1987] IRLR 292 Chapman v Oakleigh Animal Products (1970) 8 KIR 1063 ... ...
1 books & journal articles
-
LEGAL BURDEN OF PROOF AND EVIDENTIAL BURDEN OF PROOF, DISTINCTION BETWEEN
...to prove what he contends as the golden rule is that onus of proof is on the plaintiff. See: Chapman v. Oakleigh Animal Products Ltd. (1970) 8 K.I.R. 1063 at 1072. Thus, the burden rests upon the party desiring the Court to take action. He must satisfy the Court or Tribunal that the conditi......