Chatsworth Estates Company v Fewell
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1931 |
| Year | 1931 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
29 cases
-
Signature of St Albans (Property) Guernsey Ltd v Stephen Peter Wragg and 19 others
...is not necessary to show that the change in character means that there is no longer any value left in the covenant at all (as in Chatsworth Estates v Fewell [1931] 1 Ch 224). I deal with these arguments in turn. The first argument The principle 26 As to the first argument, the claimant says......
-
Singh v Rainbow Court Townhouses Ltd
...and effect of the alleged breaches or their circumstances. 28 Mr Strang relies principally on the law as stated by Farwell J in Chatsworth Estates Co v Fewell [1931] 1 Ch 224. In that case properties within the estate were subject to covenants, enforceable by the company, preventing their ......
-
The Royal Borough of Kingston-Upon-Thames v Warwick Salzer
...has been further illuminated by the Privy Council in Singh v Rainbow Court Townhouses [2018] UKPC 19 approving the dicta in Chatsworth Estates Co v Fewell [1931] 1 Ch. 224: “It is in all cases a question of degree. It is in many ways analogous to the doctrine of estoppel, and I think it i......
-
Pamela Susan Cardwell Mills v The Estate of Philip John Partridge (Deceased) (represented by Lynette Alaine Partridge)
...the land so that there is no scope for direct control over what the land owner does on the land. 126 . Mr Mitchell referred to Chatsworth Estates Company v Fewell [1931] 1 Ch 224 as an authority demonstrating that acquiescence in certain breaches of covenant did not necessarily preclude su......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...(1811) 3 Camp 80 17 Chapman’s Application, Re (1980) 42 P & CR 114, [1981] JPL 520, LT 329 Chatsworth Estates Company v Fewell [1931] 1 Ch 224 318 Chatterton v Glanford Rural District Council [1915] 3 KB 707 177 Cheltenham Builders Ltd v South Gloucestershire District Council [2003] EWH......
-
Release, Discharge or Modification of Restrictive Covenants
...for this reason that a plaintiff lost his right to an injunction or damages arising from the 2 Chatsworth Estates Company v Fewell [1931] 1 Ch 224. In this case, in order to keep their estate purely residential, covenants existed which prevented any house being used ‘otherwise than as a pri......