Chattock v Muller

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1877
Date1877
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
18 cases
  • British and Malayan Trustees Ltd v Sindo Realty Pte Ltd (in liquidation) and other actions
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • March 31, 1998
    ... ... 41.In arguing that cl 3 was capable of being specifically performed, BMT relied on the English decision of Chattock v Muller [1878] 8 Ch D 177 ... In that case, the plaintiff was intending to purchase a property called Kitswell Estate, which was to be sold by ... ...
  • McGillycuddy v Joy and Another
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • March 4, 1959
    ...constituted a fraud against which the Court would grant relief. Rochefoucauld v. BousteadELR [1897] 1 Ch. 196; Chattock v. MullerELR8 Ch. D. 177; and Devine v. FieldsDLTR 54 I.L.T.R. 101 considered and applied. (1958. No. 55 P.) McGillycuddy v. Joy and Another. THE McGILLYCUDDY OF THE REEKS......
  • Brooke Homes (Bicester) Ltd v Portfolio Property Partners Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • November 11, 2021
  • Crossco No.4 Unlimited and Others v Jolan Ltd and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • December 21, 2011
    ...Evans and Stuart-Smith LJJ agreed. 75 Chadwick LJ considered the authorities in detail. In particular, he analysed Chattock v Muller (1878) 8 Ch D 177, Pallant v Morgan [1953] Ch 43, Holiday Inns, Time Products Ltd v Combined English Stores Group (unreported) 2 December 1974 (Oliver J), and......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT