Cheney v Conn
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 03 July 1967 |
| Date | 03 July 1967 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
Tan Ah Yeo and Another v Seow Teck Ming and Another
...in a particular case there is a real conflict between international law and national law, national law must prevail: see Cheney v Conn [1968] 1 All ER 779 and Collco Dealings Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioner [1961] 1 All ER 762. In this regard, I can do no better than to cite the following......
- Seow Teck Ming and Another; Tan Ah Yeo and Another
-
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Bhajan Singh
...in argument in the Court of Appeal: Blackburn v. Attorney-General [1971] 1 W.L.R. 1037; [1971] 2 All E.R. 1380, C.A. Cheney v. Conn [1968] 1 W.L.R. 242; [1968] 1 All E.R. 779. Golder, In re (unreported), February 21, 1975, European Court of Human Rights. McWhirter v. Attorney-General [1972]......
-
CS 632 1997
...69, not its validity. What a statute says cannot be unlawful: see the judgment of Mr. Justice Ungoed-Thomas in Cheney v. Conn [1968] 1 All England Law Reports 779 at page 782. Furthermore, neither the courts nor the Commissioners have power to disregard a statute or to go behind the passage......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Parliament Acted Legally When It Passed Bill C-18
...may be made to an act of Parliament. Judge Campbell should have read these words from the High Court of England in Cheney v. Conn [1968]1 Weekly Law Reports 242: "It is not for the court to say that a parliamentary enactment, the highest law in this country, is The proper approach for a cou......
5 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...92 Chandler v. Director of Public Prosecutions [1964] AC 763 (HL)...................123 Cheney v. Conn (Inspector of Taxes) [1968] 1 WLR 242 (Ch) ...........................81 China Navigation Co. v. Attorney-General [1932] 2 KB 197 (CA) ...................123 Chung Chi Cheung v. he King [1......
-
No reflective loss: The English approach reconsidered
...225 Companies Act 2006, ss 994–996.226 Mortensen v Peters 1906 8 F(J) 93; MacCormick v Lord Advocate 1953 SC 396; Cheney v Conn 1968 1 All ER 779; Madzimbamuto v Lardner-Burke 1969 1 AC 645; Gibson v Lord Advocate 1975 1 CMLR 563; Blackburn v Attorney-General 1971 1 WLR 1073; See also Alber......
-
Treaty implementation in Caribbean law and practice
...the provisions of the treaty, but the final clauses and any provisions to which the State has 41 See, e.g., Cheney v. Conn [1968] ] All E.R. 779. See again passage quoted by Williams, C. J., in Bradshaw & Roberts from the English case of Saloman, supra n . 29 . 4 3 [1937] A.C. 326 (P.C.). 4......
-
Constitutional reform and the quest for a West Indian hermeneutics
...in the Richard S. Kay, "Comparative Constitutional Fundamentals,'* 6 Connecticut J. of Int'l Law 445, 449 (1991). 108 Cheney v. Conn [1968] All E.R. 779 quoted in Richard S. Kay, Ibid. 109 Ibid. Peter J. Steinberger, Logic and Politics: Hegel's Philosophy of Right 214(1988). West Indies eng......
Request a trial to view additional results