Cheshire v Bailey

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1905
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
29 cases
  • Morris v C. W. Martin & Sons Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 19 Mayo 1965
    ...the stole on his person and removing it from the defendants' premises was not done in the scope of his employment" He felt bound by Cheshire v. Bailey, 1905, 1 King's Bench, p. 9Mrs. Morris appeals to this Court. The case raises the important question of how far a master is liable for thef......
  • K, N. (otherwise K.) (Ireland) Ltd v C.P. Security Ltd
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 1 Enero 1986
    ...& JOHNSON (IRELAND) LTD. v. C.P. SECURITY LTD. JOHNSON & JOHNSON (IRELAND) LIMITED .v. C.P. SECURITY LIMITED Citations: CHESHIRE V BAILEY 1905 1 KB 237 LLOYD V GRACE SMITH & CO 1912 AC 716 MORRIS V C W MARTIN & SONS LTD 1965 2 AER 725 Synopsis: AGENCY Agent Dishonesty - Liability of princ......
  • Bugge v Brown
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Sanko Asia Line Ltd and the Port Swettenham Authority; TW Wu & Company (M) Sdn Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 Enero 1975
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Rough Justice in an Unjust World
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 65-2, March 2002
    • 1 Marzo 2002
    ...(overturning themisunderstanding of Barwick vEnglish Joint Stock Bank (1867) LR 2 Ex 259 adopted by the court inCheshire vBailey [1905] 1 KB 237). Nevertheless, acting for the benefit of one’s employer is strongevidence that the employee is acting in the course of his or her employment (see......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT