Chettiar v Chettiar
Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
Judgment Date | 1962 |
Date | 1962 |
Year | 1962 |
Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
76 cases
-
Tinsley v Milligan
...question. She relies on a line of authorities which includes such well-known cases as Gascoiqne v. Gascoiqne [1918] 1 K.B. 223 and Chettiar v. Chettiar [1962] A.C. 2 The facts 3First, the material facts. The house in question is 141 Thomas Street, Abertridwr, Mid-Glamorgan. It is register......
-
Shi Fang v Koh Pee Huat
...in any way. Wright`s case 23 CLR 185, supported by the observations of the Privy Council in Palaniappa Chettiar v Arunasalam Chettiar[1962] AC 294, is clear authority for its application and no decision to the contrary has been cited. ... In a property transfer case the exception applies if......
-
Chua Cheow Tien v Chua Geok Eng and Another
...for him: at [39]. Chua Kah Wee v Chua Geok Eng [1968-1970] SLR (R) 152 (refd) Palaniappa Chettiar v Arunasalam Chettiar [1962] MLJ 143; [1962] AC 294; [1962] 1 All ER 494 (distd) Scawin v Scawin (1841) 1 Y & CCC 65; 62 ER 792 (refd) Shepherd v Cartwright [1955] AC 431 (folld) Warren v Gurne......
-
Chua Kah Wee and Others v Chua Geok Eng
... ... The case of Palaniappa Chettiar v Arunasalam Chettiar , [1962] MLJ 143 (PC) was cited in support of this submission. I am unable to find that the transfer by the father to ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
8 books & journal articles
-
Lifetime Wealth Transfers and the Equitable Presumptions of Resulting Trust and Gift
...one and must not be frittered away by nice refinements.”); Fowkes v. Pascoe [1875] 10 Ch App. 343 at 352 (Eng.); Chettiar v. Chettiar [1962] AC 294 at 302 (appeal taken from Malaya) (stating that the plaintiff “must prove the trust clearly and distinctly”). 92. Charles Marshall Pty Ltd v Gr......
-
VITIATING FACTORS IN CONTRACT LAW — THE INTERACTION OF THEORY AND PRACTICE
...‘Unruly Horse’ has Bolted: Tinsley v Milligan”(1994) 57 MLR 441 at 446. 428 See eg, ARPL Palaniappa Chettiar v PLAR Arunasalam Chettiar[1962] AC 294; Gascoigne v Gascoigne[1918] 1 KB 233; In re Emery’s Investments Trusts, Emery v Emery[1959] 1 Ch 410; McEvoy v Belfast Banking Company Limite......
-
Preliminary Sections
...Williams Collier (1853) 1 EL. & BL. 630; 93 Rev. Rep. 317 8 Charles Osenton & Co. v. Johnston 1942 A.G. 130. 41 Chettiar v. Chettiar (1962) 1 All E.R. 494. 220 Chief Dada, the Lojaoke v. Chief Shittu Ogunremi (1967) N.M.L.R. 181. . 202 CASES REFERRED TO IN 1968 Chowdhavy and Another v. Gill......
-
RESULTING TRUSTS IN SINGAPORE
...female claimants and fails to respond adequately to disputes over the shared home on cohabitation breakdown.” 142 See Chettiar v Chettiar [1962] AC 294, where the Privy Council held that a father who transferred his land to his son for an illegal purpose (that is, to evade certain restricti......
Request a trial to view additional results