Chief Constable of Leicestershire v M
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1988 |
| Date | 1988 |
| Year | 1988 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
14 cases
-
Halifax Building Society v Thomas
...the mortgage has not been set aside. That appears to have been the view too of Hoffmann J. in another case of mortgage fraud, Chief Constable of Leicestershire v M [1989] 1 W.L.R. 20 where he said at p.21: "None of the lenders have made any claim by way of constructive trust or otherwise to......
-
R (on the application of MS) v Home Secretary
...in the criminal law but, in the course of his judgment, Peter Gibson LJ quoted at para 29 this statement by Hoffmann J in Chief Constable of Leicestershire v M [1989] 1 WLR 20, 23: “The recent and detailed interventions of Parliament in this field suggest that the court should not indulge i......
-
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and asylum chamber), 2015-09-22, [2015] UKUT 539 (IAC) (R (on the application of MS) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (excluded persons: Restrictive Leave policy) (IJR))
...in the course of his judgment, Peter Gibson LJ quoted at para 29 this statement by Hoffmann J in Chief Constable of Leicestershire v M [1989] 1 WLR 20, 23: “The recent and detailed interventions of Parliament in this field suggest that the court should not indulge in parallel creativity by ......
-
Attorney General v Blake
...West Mercia Constabulary -v- Wagener [1982] 1 WLR 127; Chief Constable of Hampshire -v- A. Ltd [1985] QB 132; Chief Constable of Leicestershire -v- M [1989] 1 WLR 20. The basis of that jurisdiction was uncertain: it probably derived from the common law right of a constable to detain moni......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
-
Asset Preservation Orders - Mareva Injunctions
...has been made that such common law jurisdiction should not be expanded. See Hofmann J in Chief Constable of Leicestershire v M , [1989] 1 WLR 20 at 23. 208 See Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Sharp (1988), 82 ACTR 1 (SC). 209 Income Tax Act , RSC 1985 (5th Supp), c 1, s 225.2(2). THE LAW ......
-
Table of cases
...204 OAC 17, [2005] OJ No 3973 (Div Ct) ................................................... 146 Chief Constable of Leicestershire v M, [1989] 1 WLR 20 ..................................211 Chin-Can Communication Corp v Chinese Video Centre Ltd (1983), 70 CPR (2d) 184 (FCTD) .......................
-
Asset Preservation Orders - Mareva Injunctions
...has been made that such common law jurisdiction should not be expanded. See Hoffmann J. in Chief Constable of Leicestershire v. M. , [1989] 1 W.L.R. 20 at 23. 139 See Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v. Sharp (1988), 82 A.C.T.R. 1 (S.C.). 140 R.S.C. 1985 (5th Supp), c. 1, s. 225.2(2). 141 Ib......
-
Table of Cases
...(4th) 177, 204 O.A.C. 17, [2005] O.J. No. 3973 (Div. Ct.) ............................. 96 Chief Constable of Leicestershire v. M., [1989] 1 W.L.R. 20 ............................. 137 Chin-Can Communication Corp. v. Chinese Video Centre Ltd. (1983), 70 C.P.R. (2d) 184 (F.C.T.D.) ................
Request a trial to view additional results