Child Plaintiff, & Baylie Defendant, intrat. Pasch
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1721 |
| Date | 01 January 1721 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
English Reports Citation: 81 E.R. 972
King's Bench Division
child plaintiff, & baylib defendant, intrat. pasch. 17. rot. 303. En ejectione firmse aur special verdict le case fuit tiel : 1'Evesque de Worcester fait lease pur 76 ana in trust & al use de sa feme, le lessee assigne ouster tout son terme a un Blunt aes executors & assigns, ai sa feme tarn diu vixerit & continue sole, except parcel de son terme viz. que mouant a 25 joura. Et aprea il devise que William, son fita avera le terre, & touta lea ans queux remaine del terme unexpired apres mort de Dorothie aa feme: proviao, que sil morust satis issue de son corpa ingendred donque vivant, que ceo remainera al Thomaa auter fits, & sil morust aans issue de son corps, que remaindera 2 files, & fait Dorothio sa feme son executrix, que prove son teatament aprea son mort, & per indenture consent, que William prendera son legacy apres son mort, & grant tout son estate a luy, que regrant tout son estate a la feme, feme mor. William mor. sans issue, Thomas enter & fait lease al plaintiff, le defendant vieut eins desouth tytle del feme per grant de tout le terme & interest devant son mort. Pasch. 17 Jac. fuit argue per Bridgman pur le plaintiff. Quant lessee pur ans assigne tout son interest a comencer apres son mort al feme, si el continue si longe sole, except 15 jours, le question eat, si le lessee ajant reversion & possibility poit ceo deviser ou non; & il agree que possibility sole ne poit estre devise ; mea quant ceo eat joyne ove interest ceo pasaer come est 4 Rep. 66. b. counsee grant 3 parte in posseaaion, & possibility que il ad in lea auter parts recover versus luy in dower sur eigne tytle, ceo passe 10 Rep. 48, 49. accord. [49] George Crooke al contra; le plaintiff n'ad tytle; car admit que termor que ad possibility & reversion poet deviser, tune icy quant il devise tout son terme al William, proviso, que s'il devie sans issue, que Thomas ceo avera, ceo est voyd; come in 29 H. 8. 33. Mildmayes case 6 Rep. Carbets case First Report. Devise a un & ses heires, & sil ne pay 101. donque al auter & ses heires; issint icy, devise a un & ses aasignes, il poit alien, & le devise al auter eat voyd; auxi quant dit apres, & si W. moruat sans issue de son corps, que est un tayle in effect, le ley n'expect que il morera sans issue durant le terme; aliter sur eatate pur vie la est apparent possibility que il morera. Vid. 1 E. 6. B. Grants 154. & 33 H. 6...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Barnaby Love against Wyndham
...Eoll. 612. (/) Hilary term, 9 Jac. 1. 2 Bulst. 28. Godolph. 149. (g) Cro. Jac. 459. 1 Roll. Abr. 613. 1 Eq. Gas. Ab. 192. 2 Eoll. Eep. 129. Palm. 48, 333. (a) 12 Ass. pi. 5. (b) Trinity term, 12 Car. 1, Eoll 1048. 1 Lev. 35. (a) Cro. Jac. 462. (b) 1 Eoll. Abr. 613. (c) 1 Eoll. Abr. 611. 726......
-
Green v Rod
...1 Vern. 461; 1 Ghan. Cas. 129, 131, 229 ; 2 Chan. Cas. 209 ; 1 Vern. 234, 257. 304 ; Cro. Ja. 459 ; Sir Wm. Jon. 15 ; 2 Kol. Rep. 129 ; Palm. 48, Cas. 333 ; 1 Eol. Ab. 613, 610, cited in Sir Wm. Jon. 15, denied to be law in Lamb and Archer's case, 1 Salk. 225 ; Cro. Ca. 230, 343 ; Dyer, 358......
-
Matthias Colthirst, Plaintiff, and Peter Bejushin Defendant
...as a remainder. See Co. Lit. 22 a. (f) Wing Max. reg. 167. pi. 42. (g) M. 18 H. 8. 3 b. arguendo. Co. Litt. 18 a. 10 Co. 97 b. per Reporter. Palm. 48 EASTER TERM. 4 EDW. 6. IN C. B. 1PLOWDEK, 30. if land be given to a man and to his heirs, as long as J. S. shall heirs of his body, and if J.......
-
Freeman against Taylor
...772. 2 Brownl. 103. Cro. Jac. 61. (c) 2 Roll. Abr. 404. 10 Co. 46. 2 Brownl. 172. Winch. Ent. 426. (d) 1 Eq. Abr. 192. 2 Roll. Rep. 129. Palm. 48, 333. Cro. Jac. 459. 1 Jones, 15.-But this case is denied to be law, Carth. 267 ; arid by L. C. Nottingham, in The Duke of Norfolk's case, 3 Chan......
-
Remedies for Unreasonable Search and Seizure
...the issue of whether they were, in fact, of competent jurisdiction to award Charter remedies. Also see the detailed reasons in R. v. Palmer , 48 where Durno J. held that a court acting under section 742.6 was a court of competent jurisdiction, citing, among other factors, the following poin......
-
Persona designata, punitive purposes and the issue of preventative detention orders: all roads lead to infringement of the separation of judicial power.
...Boilermakers'. (47) These sentiments have been repeated in more recent cases concerning the issue of warrants. A decade later in Grollo v Palmer, (48) the High Court considered the amendments to the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979 (Cth). It affirmed the persona designata arrangem......