China and South Sea Bank Ltd v Tan Soon Gin (alias George Tan)

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
CourtPrivy Council
Judgment Date1989
Year1989
Date1989
[PRIVY COUNCIL] CHINA AND SOUTH SEA BANK LTD. APPELLANT AND TAN SOON GIN (ALIAS GEORGE TAN) RESPONDENT [APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF HONG KONG] 1989 Oct. 25, 26; Nov. 13 Lord Keith of Kinkel, Lord Templeman, Lord Ackner, Lord Oliver of Aylmerton and Lord Goff of Chieveley

Guarantee - Debt - Mortgage securing loan - Default by debtor - Creditor not exercising power of sale over mortgaged securities - Securities becoming worthless - Whether creditor owing surety duty to exercise power of sale - Whether arguable defence that surety discharged from liability by creditor's breach of duty

The creditor made an advance to the debtor and the surety guaranteed repayment of the principal sum and interest. As security for the loan a company mortgaged to the creditor shares allegedly worth twice the sum advanced. The debtor defaulted on the date for repayment, and although the shares were then still worth more than the loan the creditor did not exercise its power of sale under the mortgage. After they had become worthless the creditor demanded payment of the principal sum and interest from the surety and brought an action against him. On the creditor's application for summary judgment under R.S.C. (Hong Kong), Ord. 14, the master gave judgment for the creditor. The judge upheld that decision but the Court of Appeal set aside that judgment and granted the defendant unconditional leave to defend, holding that it was arguable that the surety's liability was extinguished or greatly reduced by the creditor's breach of a duty owed to the surety to exercise the power of sale over the mortgaged shares.

On the creditor's appeal to the Judicial Committee: —

Held, allowing the appeal, that the creditor owed no duty to the surety to exercise its power of sale over the mortgaged securities and could decide in its own interest whether to sell and when to do so; that since the creditor had done no act injurious to the surety or inconsistent with his rights, nor failed to perform any act which it was under a duty to do, equity would not intervene to protect the surety; and that, therefore, the surety had no arguable defence to the creditor's claim under the guarantee (post, pp. 58G–H, 60A, D–E).

Watts v. Shuttleworth (1860) 5 H. & N. 235 and Wulff v. Jay (1872) L.R. 7 Q.B. 756

Per curiam. The tort of negligence has not yet subsumed all torts and does not supplant the principles of equity or contradict contractual promises or complement the remedy of judicial review or supplement statutory rights (post. p. 58F–G).

Decision of the Court of Appeal of Hong Kong reversed.

The following cases are referred to in the judgment of their Lordships:

Watts v. Shuttleworth (1860) 5 H. & N. 235

Wulff v. Jay (1872) L.R. 7 Q.B. 756

The following additional cases were cited in argument:

American Express International Banking Corporation v. Hurley [1985] 3 All E.R. 564

Cuckmere Brick Co. Ltd. v. Mutual Finance Ltd. [1971] Ch. 949; [1971] 2 W.L.R. 1207; [1971] 2 All E.R. 633, C.A.

Mutual Loan Fund Association v. Sudlow (1858) 5 C.B.N.S. 449

National Bank of Greece S.A. v. Pinios Shipping Co. No. 1 [1989] 3 W.L.R. 185; [1989] 1 All E.R. 213, C.A.

Standard Chartered Bank Ltd. v. Walker [1982] 1 W.L.R. 1410; [1982] 3 All E.R. 938, C.A.

Tai Hing Cotton Mill Ltd. v. Liu Chong Hing Bank Ltd. [1986] A.C. 80; [1985] 3 W.L.R. 317; [1985] 2 All E.R. 947, P.C.

Tse Kwong Lam v. Wong Chit Sen [1983] 1 W.L.R. 1349, P.C.

Watts v. Shuttleworth (1861) 7 H. & N. 353

APPEAL (No. 55 of 1988) with leave of the Court of Appeal of Hong Kong by the creditor, China and South Sea Bank Ltd., from the judgment of the Court of Appeal of Hong Kong (Cons V.-P., Barker and Power JJ.A.) given on 17 March 1988 allowing an appeal by the surety, Tan Soon Gin, alias George Tan, from the order of Rhind J. made on 31 May 1984 in the High Court dismissing the surety's appeal from the orders made by Master Hansen on 30 April 1984, whereby it was ordered, inter alia, that...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
192 cases
2 firm's commentaries
  • Harneys Corporate Recovery Services Guides to The Insolvency Act 2003 - Part 2
    • British Virgin Islands
    • Mondaq Virgin Islands
    • 4 August 2004
    ...2) [1990] BCLC 760 156 Cuckmere Brick Co. Ltd. v. Mutual Finance Ltd. [1971] Ch. 949; China and South Sea Bank Ltd.†v. Tan Soon Gin [1990] 1 A.C. 536; Downsview Nominees Ltd. v. First City Corporation Ltd.†[1993] A.C. 295 157 Medforth v Blake [2000] Ch 86 158 Silven Properties Ltd v Royal B......
  • High Court Confirms Rules on Banks' Duty of Care in a Lending Relationship
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 1 November 2010
    ...directors. Footnotes Angeli Luki Kotonou v National Westminster Bank Plc [2010] EWHC 1659 (Ch). China & South Sea Bank v Tan [1990] 1 AC 536. Silven Properties Ltd v Royal Bank of Scotland plc [2003] BPIR 1429 at The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the ......
15 books & journal articles
  • The receivers' relationship with the borrower
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Mortgage Receivership. Law & Practice - 2nd Edition
    • Invalid date
    ...564 despite it being argued that its decision showed no more than the existence of the duty was arguable. See also China and Southsea Bank Ltd v Tan [1990] 1 AC 536 at 544: equity intervenes to protect a surety; Barclays Bank Plc v Kingston [2006] EWHC 533 (QB): a creditor owes a duty to a ......
  • Chapter 15. Reflections on the Ambit and Reform of Part 12 of the Companies Act 1985 and The Doctrine of Constructive Notice
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis The Reform of United Kingdom Company Law Part 4. Corporate Security and Insolvency
    • Invalid date
    ...since otherwise the shares are worthless; see, by way of analogy: Standard Chartered Bank v Walker [1992] 1 WLR 561; China & South Sea Bank Ltd v Tan [1990] 1 AC 536; Worwood v Leisure Merchandising Services Ltd [2002] 1 BCLC 44 See The Jenkins Report, above n 17, at paras 301, 306(f). This......
  • Chapter 10: Claims other than in contract
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis Bills of Lading
    • Invalid date
    ...to the circumstances where concurrent duties can exist, see Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd. [1995] 2 A.C. 145. 9 China & South Sea Bank v Tan [1990] 1 A.C. 536, 543. 10 Hayn v Culliford (1879) 4 C.P.D. 182. This was in the early days of the development of the tort of negligence and the ......
  • Case Notes on Contracts of Guarantee
    • Ireland
    • Hibernian Law Journal No. 12-2013, January 2013
    • 1 January 2013
    ...not will not discharge a surety: see Moschi v Lep Air Services Ltd [1973] A.C. 331, p.348; China and South Sea Bank Ltd v Tan Soon Gin [1990] 1 A.C. 536 52 Ibid, para.5.19 53 Anglo Irish Bank Corporation plc v McGrath [2006] IEHC 78 (unreported, High Court, Kelly J, 21 December 2005) 05 Cud......
  • Get Started for Free