China v Harrow Urban District Council

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1953
Date1953
CourtDivisional Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
17 cases
  • O'mara Constructions Pty Ltd v Avery
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Decision Nº LCA 43 1999. Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), 21-03-2000
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber)
    • 21 March 2000
    ...in this decision: Hillingdon LBC v ARC Ltd [1998] 1 WLR 174; [1999] Ch 139 Pegler v Railway Executive [1948] AC 332 China v Harrow UDC [1954] 1 QB 178 West Riding CC v Huddersfield Corporation [1957] 1 QB 540 Central Electricity Generating Board v Halifax Corporation [1963] AC 785 Re Farmiz......
  • Camden London Borough Council v Herwald
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 March 1978
    ...with what it regarded as an obiter dictum of Lord Esher in Seaman's case (see pages 279-280), and in China v. Harrow U.D.C. (1954) 1 Queen's Bench 178 the Divisional Court (we think) impliedly distinguished Seaman, which was cited in argument. But we do not think we need refer further to th......
  • Hillingdon London Borough Council v ARC Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 7 April 1998
    ...a court of law. (2) The expression "cause of action" in Section 9 is correspondingly wide: see China -v- Harrow Urban District Council [1954] 1 QB 178. [In that case the expression "action" was held to include an application for a distress warrant in respect of local rates, and the "cause o......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT