Chipchase v Chipchase

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1939
Date1939
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • Re Gun Soo Thin
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1997
  • Chard v Chard
    • United Kingdom
    • Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • Invalid date
  • Re Wong Sook Mun Christina
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 31 May 2005
    ...China Insurance Co (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Liberty Insurance Pte Ltd [2005] 2 SLR (R) 509; [2005] 2 SLR 509 (refd) Chipchase v Chipchase [1939] P 391 (refd) East Punjab Province v Bachan SinghAIR 1957 Punjab 316 (refd) Gun Soon Thin, Re [1997] 2 MLJ 351 (refd) Kamtabai v UmabaiAIR 1929 Nagpur......
  • R v Sood
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 13 March 1998
    ...of public record. 21 The authorities on which Mr Worsley placed reliance were three in number: R-v-Kemp [1964] 2 WLR 648; Chipchase-v-Chipchase [1939] 3 All ER 895 and Dancer-v-Dancer [1948] 2 All ER 731. 22 In Kemp, the defendant was charged with "knowingly and wilfully solemnizing a marri......
  • Get Started for Free