Chohan v Saggar
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1994 |
| Year | 1994 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
20 cases
-
Trowbridge v Trowbridge
...Blyth v Blyth [1966] 1 All ER 524, [1966] AC 643, [1966] 2 WLR 634, HL. Brabon, Re, Treharne v Brabon [2001] 1 BCLC 11. Chohan v Saggar [1994] 1 BCLC 706, Drake v Whipp[1996] 2 FCR 296, [1996] 1 FLR 826, CA. Gissing v Gissing [1970] 2 All ER 780, [1971] AC 886, [1970] 3 WLR 255, HL. Grant v......
-
Kazakhstan Kagazy Plc v Baglan Abdullayevich Zhunus (formerly Baglan Abdullayevich Zhunussov)
...interests; in other words, by restoring assets to the debtor to make them available for execution by the victims”: see Chohan v Saggar [1994] 1 BCLC 706, 714, per Nourse LJ. “A claim under section 423 is a claim for some appropriate form of restorative remedy, to restore property to the tra......
-
Brigita Morina v Catherine Mairead McAleavey
...should be permitted. 154 In this context I think that it is useful to make reference to what was said by Nourse LJ, in Chohan v Saggar [1994] BCC 134, at 141C-E: “The object of s. 423–425 being to remedy the avoidance of debts, the ‘and’ between para. (a) and (b) of s. 423(2) must be read c......
-
B v IB
...had not been entered into" which to my mind says in plain English exactly the same thing as "annulling a voidable transaction". In Chohan v Saggar [1994] 1 BCLC 706, CA Nourse LJ explained that Parliament in enacting s423 had intended the court to have much fuller powers than were previousl......
Request a trial to view additional results