Chrulew and Others v Borm-Reid & Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtQueen's Bench Division
Judgment Date16 May 1991
Date16 May 1991

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
18 cases
  • Everglade Maritime Inc. v Schiffahrtsgesellschaft Detlef Von Appen m.b.H. (Maria)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • Invalid date
    ... ... Ltd. v. Pollak [ 1927 ] A.C. 732 , H.L.(E.) ... Chrulew v. Borm-Reid & Co. [ 1992 ] 1 W.L.R. 176 ; [ 1992 ] 1 All E.R ... ...
  • Judgment O'Reilly v Neville
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 31 July 2020
    ...and Wales speak in terms of whether the claimant “ought reasonably to have accepted” the Calderbank offer: see, for instance, Chrulew v Borm-Reid & Co (a firm) [1992] 1 All ER 953, at 960a. That formulation appears to allow that there may be circumstances where it was reasonable not to acc......
  • Padmanor Investments Ltd v Soundcraft Electronics Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
  • Horsford v Bird and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 28 November 2006
    ...less than the amount claimed. He submits that the decision by the costs judge was fair and reasonable. 13 As Waller J observed in Chrulew v Borm-Reid & Co [1992] 1 WLR 176, 185E-F, the expectation at the conclusion of a taxation is that normally the party whose bill is being taxed will be ......
  • Get Started for Free