Chrulew and Others v Borm-Reid & Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 16 May 1991 |
| Date | 16 May 1991 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
19 cases
-
Fattal and Another v Walbrook Trustees (Jersey) Ltd and Another
...the rebuttable presumption that a party should have its costs of the assessment - see CPR 47.18 and Horsford v Bird [2006] UKPC 55; Chrulew v Borm-Reid & Co [1992] 1 WLR 176. 52 In the latter case, the costs of the appellant were reduced by about a third, but the Privy Council declined to r......
-
Butcher v Wolfe and Wolfe
...of the reasonableness or otherwise of the refusal to accept the offer—see Cutts v Head [1984] Ch 290 at 302 per Oliver J, and Chrulew & Others v Borm-Reid & Co [1992] 1 WLR 176 at 182A. This approach is to be compared with the payment into court where, in the absence of a special reason for......
-
Judgment O'Reilly v Neville
...and Wales speak in terms of whether the claimant “ought reasonably to have accepted” the Calderbank offer: see, for instance, Chrulew v Borm-Reid & Co (a firm) [1992] 1 All ER 953, at 960a. That formulation appears to allow that there may be circumstances where it was reasonable not to acc......
- Padmanor Investments Ltd v Soundcraft Electronics Ltd
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
TAXATION OF PARTY AND PARTY COSTS IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS
...Ltd[1992] 1 WLR 465, the court held that an offer made prior to the commencement of taxation proceedings was not ineffective. 127. [1992] 1 All ER 953. 128. Which is Order 62 Rule 27(3) and (4) of the English Rules of Supreme Court. 129. See Order 22A of the Rules of Supreme Court and the S......