Church v Brownewick
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1714 |
| Date | 01 January 1714 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
English Reports Citation: 82 E.R. 1140
King's Bench Division
18. church versus brownewick. Dett sur obligac' defendant demand oyer & est pur pay the moiety of all such money as he shall receive & plead payment del moiety & bone si le condition soit (from time to time) mes si nest doet plead specialment. In dett sur obligacon defendant demand oyer del condicon quel fuit, that the defendant shall pay from time to time the moiety of all such money as he shall receive and give account, & plead que ad pay le moiety, &c. Et sur ceo demurr'. Et per Cur' le plea de payment est bone sans monstre les particular sums, & ceo pur avoid le stuffing del rolls ove multiplicity de matter, car il ad plead payment del money del 5 particular sums & monstre eux quel est tout, &c. Lou ad receive 10 several sums plaintiff ne prender asc advantage de ceo q il ad plead mes per replying q il ad receive tiel sum de quel nad pay le moity, &e. Uncore le Court agree, le case de H. 7. q si...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Hancocke vic. Company v Prowd, Administrator of Yope
...were not a just one, the other side may shew it in the replication. Cro. Eliz. 471, Further v. Further. 1 Lev. 200, Palmer v. Lawstm. S. C. 1 Sid. 333. Garth. 8, Lake v. Raw. 1 Lutw. 662, Robinsim v. Carbett. 1 Str. 410, Williams v. Fowler. Skyn. 586. For the same reason an averment that th......
-
Roberts v Mariett
...a. Norwood v. Read. 10 H. 6, 25 a. Fitz. Executors, 21. Vaugh. 97-100, Edgcombe v. Dee. Cro. Jac. 47, Fisher v. Richardson. S. C. Yelv. 55. 1 Sid. 333, Palmer v. Lawmi.(c) (b) [But wager of law was abolished by the stat. 3 & 4 W. 4, c. 27, s. 13; and therefore such action may now be well br......
-
Richard Norwood, Plaintiff, against Thomas Norwood and Edward Read
...9 Co. 87. Pinchon's case. 10 Co. 77. a. Godb. 176. Kercher's case. Cro. J. 47. Fisher \. Richardson. 1 Rol. R. 266. Saunders v. Esterly. 1 Sid. 333. per Cur. 1 Lev. 201. arguendo. Theol. Dig. lib. 4. cap. 9. 20. Swinb. 398, 399, 400. Godolph. Orph. Leg. 196. 1. Went. Off. of Exec. 121. Nels......
-
Arnold Waring v Perkins
...and gave rule to have the judgment reversed. But two days after, Coventry, Attorney General, moved it again, and produced (a) 1 Lev. 200. 1 Sid. 333. Hard. 335. 1 Salk. 1. 520. 540 MICHAELMAS TERM, 19 JAC. 1. IN B. R. OKO. JAC.628. the hands of all the prothonotaries of the Common Pleas, th......