Churchill & Sim v Goddard
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Date | 1936 |
| Year | 1936 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
4 cases
-
PJSC National Bank Trust v Boris Mints
... ... satisfactorily the other way around, yet privity in interest appears equally to arise there ( Spencer Bower & Handley , [9.44] citing Churchill and Sim v Goddard [1937] 1 KB 92, 103–104 ). ii) It is not entirely clear where the “standing by” cases would fit into this analysis ... ...
-
Bank of Ireland v Educational Building Society
...LTD 1926 AC 670 BILLS OF EXCHANGE ACT 1882 S2 BILLS OF EXCHANGE ACT 1882 S29(1) LEWIS V CLAY 67 LJ QB 224 CHURCHILL & SIM V GODDARD 1937 1 KB 92 TALBOT V VON BORIS 1911 1 KB 854 NATIONAL BANK LTD V O'CONNOR 1969 103 ILTR 73 RSC O.37 r1 CRAWFORD V GILLMOR 30 LR IR 238 FIRST NATIONAL COMM......
-
Millennium Commodity Trading Ltd v BS Tech Pte Ltd
...contract” as well as “any antecedent debt or liability”. These principles were summarised by Scott LJ in Churchill and Sim v Goddard [1937] 1 KB 92 at 109 and 110: [V]arious decisions about failure of consideration were cited to establish the well-accepted principle that if the consideratio......
-
Central Bank of Yemen (Appellants Defendants) v Cardinal Financial Investments Corporation (Respondents Claimants)
...in the underlying transaction, it is liable on the note as a principal and the other party has no liability on the note. See Churchill & Son v Goddard [1937] 1 KB 92 per Lord Roche at p 103 ("the Law Merchant and Common Law founded thereon of themselves, as I think, had regard only to the p......
3 books & journal articles
-
Preliminary Sections
...House Ltd. (1947) K.B. 130; (1956) 1 All E.R. 256; n.; (1947) L.J.R. 77; 175 L.T. 332; 62 T.L.R. 557. 425 Churchill & Sim v. Goddard, (1937) 1 K.B. 92; (1936) 1 All. E.R. 675; 105 LJ.K.B. 571; 154 L.T. 586; 52 T.L.R. 356; 80 Sol. Jo. 285. 112 CASES REFERRED TO IN 1962 Clayton's Case: Devayn......
-
Agency
...liable to his principal for the debts of customers. “Three cases, namely, Shaw v. Woodcock. 108 E.R. 652, Churchill and Sim v. Goddard, (1937) 1, K. B 92, and Houghton v. Matthews , 127 E.R. 263 have been brought to our notice by Mr. Lawson. They do not appear to me to bear relevance or to ......
-
DEL CREDERE AGENCY
...would be made liable for the outstanding debts unpaid. Three cases, namely, Shaw v. Woodcok 108 E.R. 652, Churchill and Sin v. Goddard (1937) 1, K.B. 92, and Houghton v. Matthews 127 E.R. 263 have been brought to our notice by Mr. Lawson. They do not appear to me to bear relevance or to be ......