Churchill & Sim v Goddard
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1936 |
| Date | 1936 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
PJSC National Bank Trust v Boris Mints
... ... satisfactorily the other way around, yet privity in interest appears equally to arise there ( Spencer Bower & Handley , [9.44] citing Churchill and Sim v Goddard [1937] 1 KB 92, 103–104 ). ii) It is not entirely clear where the “standing by” cases would fit into this analysis ... ...
-
Bank of Ireland v Educational Building Society
...LTD 1926 AC 670 BILLS OF EXCHANGE ACT 1882 S2 BILLS OF EXCHANGE ACT 1882 S29(1) LEWIS V CLAY 67 LJ QB 224 CHURCHILL & SIM V GODDARD 1937 1 KB 92 TALBOT V VON BORIS 1911 1 KB 854 NATIONAL BANK LTD V O'CONNOR 1969 103 ILTR 73 RSC O.37 r1 CRAWFORD V GILLMOR 30 LR IR 238 FIRST NATIONAL COMM......
-
MK International Development Company Ltd (Plaintiffs)Respondents) v The Housing Bank (Defendants)Appellants)
...Bradshaw (1850) 19 L.J.C.P. 273, but I pass this by because it is more relevant to section 27(2), and go to Churchill & Sim v. Goddard [1937] 1 K.B. 92. The plaintiffs were del credere agents for exporters of goods. On receipt of the shipping documents from their principals the appellants f......
-
Central Bank of Yemen (Appellants Defendants) v Cardinal Financial Investments Corporation (Respondents Claimants)
...party in the underlying transaction, it is liable on the note as a principal and the other party has no liability on the note. See Churchill & Son v Goddard [1937] 1 KB 92 per Lord Roche at p 103 ("the Law Merchant and Common Law founded thereon of themselves, as I think, had regard only to......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Preliminary Sections
...House Ltd. (1947) K.B. 130; (1956) 1 All E.R. 256; n.; (1947) L.J.R. 77; 175 L.T. 332; 62 T.L.R. 557. 425 Churchill & Sim v. Goddard, (1937) 1 K.B. 92; (1936) 1 All. E.R. 675; 105 LJ.K.B. 571; 154 L.T. 586; 52 T.L.R. 356; 80 Sol. Jo. 285. 112 CASES REFERRED TO IN 1962 Clayton's Case: Devayn......
-
Agency
...liable to his principal for the debts of customers. “Three cases, namely, Shaw v. Woodcock. 108 E.R. 652, Churchill and Sim v. Goddard, (1937) 1, K. B 92, and Houghton v. Matthews , 127 E.R. 263 have been brought to our notice by Mr. Lawson. They do not appear to me to bear relevance or to ......
-
DEL CREDERE AGENCY
...would be made liable for the outstanding debts unpaid. Three cases, namely, Shaw v. Woodcok 108 E.R. 652, Churchill and Sin v. Goddard (1937) 1, K.B. 92, and Houghton v. Matthews 127 E.R. 263 have been brought to our notice by Mr. Lawson. They do not appear to me to bear relevance or to be ......