Churchill & Sim v Goddard

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Date1936
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Bank of Ireland v Educational Building Society
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 1 January 1999
    ...LTD 1926 AC 670 BILLS OF EXCHANGE ACT 1882 S2 BILLS OF EXCHANGE ACT 1882 S29(1) LEWIS V CLAY 67 LJ QB 224 CHURCHILL & SIM V GODDARD 1937 1 KB 92 TALBOT V VON BORIS 1911 1 KB 854 NATIONAL BANK LTD V O'CONNOR 1969 103 ILTR 73 RSC O.37 r1 CRAWFORD V GILLMOR 30 LR IR 238 FIRST NATIONAL COMM......
  • MK International Development Company Ltd (Plaintiffs)Respondents) v The Housing Bank (Defendants)Appellants)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 21 December 1990
    ...Bradshaw (1850) 19 L.J.C.P. 273, but I pass this by because it is more relevant to section 27(2), and go to Churchill & Sim v. Goddard [1937] 1 K.B. 92. The plaintiffs were del credere agents for exporters of goods. On receipt of the shipping documents from their principals the appellants f......
  • Central Bank of Yemen (Appellants Defendants) v Cardinal Financial Investments Corporation (Respondents Claimants)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 23 October 2000
    ...party in the underlying transaction, it is liable on the note as a principal and the other party has no liability on the note. See Churchill & Son v Goddard [1937] 1 KB 92 per Lord Roche at p 103 ("the Law Merchant and Common Law founded thereon of themselves, as I think, had regard only to......
  • Millennium Commodity Trading Ltd v BS Tech Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 27 March 2017
    ...contract” as well as “any antecedent debt or liability”. These principles were summarised by Scott LJ in Churchill and Sim v Goddard [1937] 1 KB 92 at 109 and 110: [V]arious decisions about failure of consideration were cited to establish the well-accepted principle that if the consideratio......
3 books & journal articles
  • Preliminary Sections
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1962 Preliminary Sections
    • 11 November 2022
    ...House Ltd. (1947) K.B. 130; (1956) 1 All E.R. 256; n.; (1947) L.J.R. 77; 175 L.T. 332; 62 T.L.R. 557. 425 Churchill & Sim v. Goddard, (1937) 1 K.B. 92; (1936) 1 All. E.R. 675; 105 LJ.K.B. 571; 154 L.T. 586; 52 T.L.R. 356; 80 Sol. Jo. 285. 112 CASES REFERRED TO IN 1962 Clayton's Case: Devayn......
  • Agency
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Sasegbon’s Laws of Nigeria. Volume 1 Agency
    • 8 September 2016
    ...liable to his principal for the debts of customers. “Three cases, namely, Shaw v. Woodcock. 108 E.R. 652, Churchill and Sim v. Goddard, (1937) 1, K. B 92, and Houghton v. Matthews , 127 E.R. 263 have been brought to our notice by Mr. Lawson. They do not appear to me to bear relevance or to ......
  • DEL CREDERE AGENCY
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Sasegbon’s Judicial Dictionary of Nigerian Law. First edition D
    • 6 February 2019
    ...would be made liable for the outstanding debts unpaid. Three cases, namely, Shaw v. Woodcok 108 E.R. 652, Churchill and Sin v. Goddard (1937) 1, K.B. 92, and Houghton v. Matthews 127 E.R. 263 have been brought to our notice by Mr. Lawson. They do not appear to me to bear relevance or to be ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT