Ciampa v British India Steam Navigation Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1915
CourtKing's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
21 cases
  • Reardon Smith Line Ltd v Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Agostino Bertani, Cape Rodney, Queen City, Riverton)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 28 Marzo 1961
    ...complete cargo to be performed. 44 I turn now to the appellants' second argument. ( Ciampa v. British India Steam Navigation Co. 1915 2 King's Bench, page 774) is said to establish a doctrine or apply an established doctrine that neither party can rely on an exceptions clause in a charterpa......
  • Actis Company Ltdv Sanko Steamship Company Ltd (Aquacharm, Mini Lux)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 15 Octubre 1981
    ...that she had to be lightened to pass through the Panama Canal, but that did not make her unfit. It is quite unlike Ciampa & ors. v. British India Steam Navigation Co. Ltd. (1915) 2 King's Bench 774. The vessel there was unfit to carry the cargo safely because she had to be fumigated. So al......
  • Compagnie Algerienne de Meunerie v Katana Societa di Navigatione Marittima, S.P.A. (Nizetti.)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 29 Febrero 1960
    ...upon the absence of a bill of health. 12 Reliance is also placed on ( Ciampa v. British India Steam Navigation Company, Limited 1915 2 King's Bench, page 774), where it was held that the ordinary perils to which cargo may be exposed may include such treatment of the ship and cargo (for exam......
  • Alize 1954 and CMA CGM SA v Allianz Elementar Versicherungs AG and 16 Ors
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 4 Marzo 2020
    ...was difficult to say that the defect in question went to an attribute of the vessel was the decision of Rowlatt J in Ciampa v British India Steam Navigation Company Ltd [1915] 2 KB 44 Mr Russell QC submitted that the suggestion by Mr Hill QC that an error of navigation could not make the v......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT