Citi-March Ltd v Neptune Orient Lines Ltd (Humber Bridge)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1996 |
| Date | 1996 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
41 cases
-
Golden Shore Transportation Pte Ltd v UCO Bank and Another Appeal
...clause are different from those applicable to determining forum non conveniens: see Citi-March Ltd v Neptune Orient Lines Ltd [1997] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 72 at 76 per Colman J. As this Court noted in The Vishva Apurva [1992] 2 SLR 175 at “In a case involving an exclusive jurisdiction clause, the d......
-
Donohue v. Armco Inc. et al., (2001) 294 N.R. 356 (HL)
...[para. 27]. Taunton-Collins v. Cromie, [1964] 1 W.L.R. 633 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 27]. Citi-March Ltd. v. Neptune Orient Lines Ltd., [1996] 1 W.L.R. 1367, refd to. [para. Mahavir Minerals Ltd. v. Cho Yang Shipping Co.; Ship M C Pearl, Re, [1997] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 566, refd to. [para. 27]. Bou......
-
The Republic of Angola (2) (Acting by and Through the Ministry of Finance of Angola) v Perfectbit Ltd
...of the same loss must be brought in different jurisdictions, that there will be inconsistent decisions on the facts”: Citi-March Ltd v Neptune Orient Lines Ltd [1996] 1 WLR 1367 per Colman J at 1375F-G 3) “If the proceedings … against the applicants are heard in Kazakhstan … there is an ob......
-
Barros Mattos Junior and Others v MacDaniels Ltd and Others Same v General Securities and Finance Company Ltd and another Barros Mattos Junior and Others v MacDaniels Ltd and Others Same v General Securities and Finance Company Ltd and another Barros Mattos Junior and Others v MacDanields Ltd and Others; Same v General Securities and Finance Company Ltd and another
...in one action. Third, it is apparent from The "Goldean Mariner" [1989] 2 Lloyd's Rep 390, 400,Citi-March Ltd v Neptune Orient Lines Ltd [1996] 1 WLR 1367, 1376 and Dicey & Morris 13th Ed. para 12–027 that the court does consider the efficient conduct of litigation against a number of defend......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
ENFORCING ENGLISH JURISDICTION CLAUSES IN BILLS OF LADING
...court refuses to enforce a foreign jurisdiction agreement because of multiple proceedings see Citi-March Ltd v Neptune Orient Lines Ltd[1996] 2 All ER 545; [1997] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 72; The MC Pearl[1997] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 566; and obiter, Konkola Copper Mines Plc v Coromin Ltd[2006] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 4......
-
NO DISPUTE AMOUNTING TO STRONG CAUSE; STRONG CAUSE FOR DISPUTE?
...and trial allowed to proceed notwithstanding the jurisdiction clause. See The El Amria[1981] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 119; Citi-Murch v Neptune[1996] 1 WLR 1367. Peel, supra, at 222, observes that the problems posed by multiplicity of proceedings have proved to be the most reliable basis upon which to......