A City Council v T, J and K

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Neutral Citation[2011] EWHC 1082 (Fam)
Year2011
Date2011
CourtFamily Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Re P-S (Children) (Care Proceedings: Evidence)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • March 21, 2013
    ...authorities to which she had been referred, namely Re: W (Children) (Abuse: Oral Evidence) [2010] UKSC 12, [2010] 1 WLR 701 and A City Council v T, J and K [2011] EWHC 1082 (Fam), [2011] 2 FLR 803, dealt with radically different situations from the one with which the court was faced, the ......
  • Re P-S (Children) (Care Proceedings: Right to Give Evidence)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • Invalid date
    ...(meeting with child: contamination of proceedings), Re[2012] EWCA Civ 185, [2012] 1 FCR 600, [2012] 2 FLR 369. A City Council, A v T[2011] EWHC 1082 (Fam), [2011] 2 FLR H (a child) (abuse: oral evidence), Re[2011] EWCA Civ 741, [2012] 1 FLR 186. Mabon v Mabon[2005] EWCA Civ 634, [2005] 2 FC......
  • F1 and F2 v M1 and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • December 20, 2013
    ...court for this hearing, nor has she had general access to the documents; having regard to the observations of Peter Jackson J in A City Council v T, J and K [2011] EWHC 1082 (Fam) [2011] 2 FLR 803 [2011] 2 FLR 803, I can confirm that I support the stance taken by her representatives in this......
  • Re S (Children) (Child Abduction: Joinder of Sibling)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • Invalid date
    ...(see In re LC, para 55), withinthe “wide discretion” of the court (see also Peter Jackson J in A City Council v T [2011] EWHC 1082(Fam); [2011] 2 FLR 803). Where party status has been given to a non-subject child, particularlyone who is a mature 17-year old, I would limit the extent of her ......
1 books & journal articles
  • Secure Accommodation
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Child Care and Protection Law and Practice - 6th Edition Contents
    • August 29, 2019
    ...and child, if of sufficient understanding, the opportunity to make representations about the child’s attendance. In Re K (A Child) [2011] EWHC 1082 (Fam), the court held that there is no presumption that a child should not attend. The only reason to prevent the attendance of a child who wis......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT