Civilian War Claimants Association v R
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 19 November 1931 |
| Date | 19 November 1931 |
| Docket Number | Case No. 118 |
| Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
31 cases
-
Attorney General v Nissan
...because they are not cognizable in the Courts, see Rustomjee v. The Queen (1876) 2 Q.B.D. p. 69, Civilian War Claimants v. The King, 1932 A.C. p. 14. Those cases have no application here because Mr Nissan does not base his claim - he does not need to base it - on any treaty or the like. He ......
-
The High Commissioner for Pakistan in the United Kingdom v Prince Mukarram Jah, His Exalted Highness the 8th Nizam of Hyderabad
...such well-known cases as Nabob of the Carnatic v East India Co, (1792–3) 2 Ves 56 and Civilian War Claimants Association Ltd v The King, [1932] AC 14 to show that no action would lie for money had and received or upon a trust. The court would not listen to an enquiry whether the Finance Min......
-
Lonrho Exports Ltd v Export Credits Guarantee Department [ChD]
...[1965] Ch 745. Burnand v Rodocanachi Sons & Co (1882) App Cas 333. Civilian War Claimants Association Ltd v The KingELR [1932] AC 14. Cousins (H) & CoLtd v D & C Carriers Ltd [1971] 2QB 230. German Property (Administrator of) v KnoopELR [1933] Ch 439. Gschwind v Swiss Confederation (1932) 6......
-
The High Commissioner for Pakistan in the United Kingdom v Prince Mukkaram Jah, His Exalted Highness the 8th Nizam of Hyderabad and Others (Defendants/Interpleader Claimants) National Westminster Bank Plc (Defendant/Stakeholder)
...so, though the peculiar position of the Crown makes it less likely than with a subject that this is intended." Thus, in Civilian War Claimants Association Ltd v The King [1932] AC 14, where the issue was whether reparations paid by Germany under the Treaty of Versailles were received by the......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...160 (PC) ........................... 65, 80, 85, 90, 187–88, 195–200, 209–10, 215, 258–59, Civilian War Claimants’ Association v. he King [1932] AC 14 (HL) .............238 Collco Dealings Ltd v. Inland Revenue Commissioners [1962] AC 1 ............................................................
-
Treaties
...Transactions of the Grotius Society 51 at 75 n. (c). Lauterpacht cites three authorities: Civilian War Claimants’ Association v. he King [1932] AC 14 (HL); Rustomjee v. he Queen (1876) 1 QBD 487 (Eng QB), (1876) 2 QBD 69 (CA); and Baron de Bode v. he Queen (1845) 8 QB 208, “where,” says Lau......
-
Is There a 'New' Law of Intervention and Occupation?
...SHAKE HANDS WITH THE DEVIL (2003). 79. HlGGINS, supra note 77, at 295 et seq. 80. Civilian War Claimants Association v. The King [1932] A.C. 14. (House of Lords). 81. Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-Internatio......