Clark v Clark
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1999 |
| Year | 1999 |
| Date | 1999 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Tt v Cds (Rev 1)
...The wife retained the balance of approximately £760,000. 70 Thorpe LJ returned to the issue of litigation misconduct in Clark v Clark [1999] 2 FLR 498. I do not propose to summarise the facts of that case which Thorpe LJ described, at p. 509, as, “as baleful as any to be found in the family......
-
R v B & Ors
...A court could undoubtedly reduce the award from reasonable requirements generously assessed, to something less, applying Clark v Clark[1999] 3 FCR 49. It might be that, unless there was no alternative, a court should not reduce a party to a ‘predicament of real need’ (see Radmacher v Granat......
-
Chan Tin Sun v Fong Quay Sim
...v Bateman [1979] Fam 25 (refd) BCB v BCC [2013] 2 SLR 324 (refd) Chan Tin Sun v Fong Quay Sim [2014] 3 SLR 945 (overd) Clark v Clark [1999] 2 FLR 498 (refd) Evans v Evans [1989] 1 FLR 351 (refd) Fong Quay Sim v PP Criminal Motions Nos 34 of 2011 and 36 of 2010 and Magistrate's Appeal No 183......
-
K v L
...it was possible for the court to formulate such a statement with any confidence. My views run in parallel with those of Thorpe LJ in Clark v Clark [1999] 2 FLR 498, in which he said, at 507H: “Judicial estimations of fair outcome reflecting gross misconduct should not be too refined or rare......
Request a trial to view additional results