Clark v Woor

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1965
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 cases
  • King v Victor Parsons & Company
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 16 November 1972
    ...is an unconscionable thing for the one to do towards the other". In view of the decision in Applegate v. Moss (1971) 1 Q.B. 406 and Clark v. Woor (1965) 1 WLR at page 650, there can be no doubt that such a relationship can and did exist between this purchaser and the vendor agreeing to proc......
  • Applegate v Moss
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 11 December 1970
    ...see Kitchen T. Royal Air Force Association (1958 1 W.L.R. 563): a test which was applied in the case of a building contract in Clark v. Woor (1965 1 W.L.R. 650). Those oases show that "fraud" is not used in the common law sense. It is used in the equitable sense to denote conduct by the def......
  • Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 11 March 2021
    ...Co v Osborne [1899] AC 351. Cave v Robinson Jarvis & Rolf (a firm) [2002] UKHL 18; [2003] 1 CLC 101; [2003] 1 AC 384. Clark v Woor [1965] 1 WLR 650. De Beers UK Ltd v Atos Origin IT Services UK Ltd [2010] EWHC 3276 (TCC). Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337. Dunlop Haywards (DHL) Ltd v Barbo......
  • Dodd Properties (Kent) Ltd v Canterbury City Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 December 1979
    ...faced could reasonably, and probably would, have come to the same decision. 46The judge relied on Philips v. Ward (1956) 1 WLR 471 and Clark v. Woor (1965) 2 ASR 355, in which Mr. Justice Lawton (as he then was) simply followed and applied Philips v. Ward. I agree with Lord Justice Megaw t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Variations
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume II - Third Edition
    • 13 April 2020
    ...may be available more cheaply than 16 Kemp v Rose (1858) 1 Gif 258 at 268–269, per Stuart V-C [65 Er 910 at 914–915]. 17 Clark v Woor [1965] 1 WLr 650. See also Robb v Mann (1881) 15 SaLr 53 at 68, per Way CJ; Ramsay v Brand (1898) 6 SLT 114. 18 See English Industrial Estates Corp v Kier Co......
  • Defects
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume II - Third Edition
    • 13 April 2020
    ...[2016] VSCa 133. 26 See Davis & Co (Wines) Ltd v Afa-Minerva (EMI) Ltd (1973) 9 BLr 99 at 107, per Judge Fay QC. 27 Clark v Woor [1965] 1 WLr 650; Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth [1996] aC 344 at 361, per Lord Mustill. he obligation of the contractor to use a particular ty......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT