Claxton v Swift en Cam' Seaccar' sur Judgment done v Claxtone B. R
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1704 |
| Date | 01 January 1704 |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
English Reports Citation: 125 E.R. 475
Common Pleas Division
sollicitatione ipsoruru Daniel' & Marie vel eorurn alicujus quovismodo operat' vel negaciat' fuerunt in confectioue vestium vel vestitnent' pro aliquo hujusmodi customer' Et-de hoc, &e. Mes nul similiter est enter, Et content quo les }tarok de le Plea stintdifferent de eux mention en le Breach assign, uucore Judgment fuit done pur le Def, quant al ceo auxi. 3. Le Demurrer est auxi al respons al 5 Breach assign, que est que (apres le determination de le Partnership) le Def. & le dit Mary sa Feme Wont use lour Diligence a transferrer lour Occupation en le dit Partnership al Pi. & touts Customers, &c. Et al ceo le Def. dist, Que ii & ea dit Feme al ascun temps apres l'expiration de dit Partnership, no unques fueront request, on un de eux fuit request a execute les dit' premises. Et quant al ceo Judgment fuit done pur le Pl. 4. Le Demurrer est auxi al respons al 6, 7 & 8. Breach, queux touts sootun mesme effect, & le primer de eux est issint assigne viz. que le dit Mary ileitis les dits 4 Ans scat, tiel jour, &c. ad prise hors de le Possession de Pl. divers Ileum (notmant eux) concernant le dit occupation, &e. & ad refuse a delivrer eux a luy sur request, &c. [878] Et al ceux trois Breaches concernant le caption & detent' de dits lieurs le Def. plead que le Pi, de temps en temps en le Narr' ad & puissoit aver ewe le Inspection & perlection de lee diets lieurs per luy mesme, on per un Tho. Foster le Servant de Pl. & le dit Mary, al cest intent elect & appoint, sans ascun detention de eux ou ascun de our de le Pl. per le dit Mary, per les dits several tetnps, ou mutt space de temps en le Narr' respectivement specific modo & forma. prout, &c. Et de hoc &c. Mee nul similiter. Et quant al ceo Judgment fuit auxi done put. le Pl. & sm. le Brief de Error nul exception fuit prise al ceux deux darr' Judgments. Note, Que per lee Articles le Copartnership fuit a continuer pur 4 Ans. si Mary Hodges cy langment viveroit : Et West expresment averr que el viva ay longment. Mee la Knit ascun choses en le Narr' queux poient curer cest defect, especialment apres Verdict, come pur Example en le 4 Breach del Covenant, est alledge, que Hodges & Mary sa Fame apres les 4 aus overeront en le Trade, que est impossible si el morust durant lee 4 Am. CLAXTON v. SWIFT en Cam' Scaccar' sur Judgment done vet's Claxtonen B. R. en Action sur le Case sur un Bill de Exchange. Intrat. Hill. 36 & 37 Car. 2. R. R. Rot. 1163. Ptita coram Dflo Rege spud Westm scitt Termino Sci Hillarij arum regni Did Caroli secundi Regis Anglie &c. tricesimo sexto & tricesimo septimo alum% regni Dni Jacobi secundi none Regis Anglie &c. primo. Rot. 1163. London se. Meroorand' Eid ate scitt Termino See Trinitatis tilt' pterie coram Dtio Rege spud Westin von Edrus' Claxton Mercator per Niehum Baker Attorn suu Et ptulit hie in Cur' dei Phi Regis tune ibidem quandam billam suam Pints Will'm Swift jun' mercator' iti custod' Mar? &c. de ptito transgr' super casurn Et aunt pleg' de osequendo scil't Jobannes Doe & Rie-us Roe que quidern bitla sequitur in hec verbs: ea. Loudon se. Edrua' Claxton mercator queritur de Will'o Swift jun' mercatore in misted' Mar? Mareec' Dni Regis coram ipso Rege existen' pro eo videl't (id cum Civitas London in hoc regno Anglie modo sit & a tempore cujits contrar' memoria hominu non existit fuit antiqua Civitas Cumq, etiam Civitas in hoc regno Anglie sit & a toto tempore supradicto etiam fuit antique Civitas Cumq, apud London pred' in paroch bte Marie de Arcuhus in Wards de Cheap habetur & exiatit & a tote tempore supdicto habebatur & fuit quedam consuetudo & ap,pbat' inter mores-tares & al' peon' apud Civit' London' pred' residen' & mercatores & al' peon' spud Civit' Wigorn' pred'coin'oran' videl't "qd si aliquis mercator sive al' person apud Civit' Wigorn' ered' residen' fecerit aliquam billam sive notam in scriptis sub menu sua secdm usum & consuetud' mercator' signet' Et builioi bill sive nota alicui al' mercator' sive at' peon apud Civit' London residen' direxit' & per huiiioi billa sive note, sic direct' requisivit huilioi al' mercator' cui hualoi bills sive note, sic fuit direct' ad aliquod ternr in hniiioi bills excambij sive riots content' solvers alicui al' mercator' sive al' parson' vel ordini suo aliquam denar' Burnam existen' pro valore recept' & si huirmi mercator sive al' person' cui hualoi billa sive nets sic hilt direct' hujusmodi billam sive 476 ERROR 1 LUTWYCRE, 879. 'totem seethe usa & consuetud' mercator' acceptavit & si post hurlioi acceptaeotiern huiiioi bille sive note per hulnoi mercator' cui humoi billa sive note, sic fuit direct' & ante soluconem humoi denar' suniam in builoi bills sive rota mete:auto; humoi mercat' sive al' pson cui bumoi denariorum sutra per hualoi billam sive notate fuit appunctuat' solvend per indorsement' sub menu sua subscript' super huriloi billam sive notam ordinavit content' (Anglice the Contents) hurisoi bille sive note solveud' alicui al' person' vel ordini Et si ante solueonem hujusmodi bille sive note hnjustnocli persotte cui content' (Anglice the Contents) hulhoi bale sive note per huilioi indorsement' appunctuat' fuit fore solveud' per al' indorsarnent' sub menu sua ,ppr' subscript' super huaioi billam sive notate orditiavit content' (Anglice the Contents) huinoi bille sive note solvela alicui al' person' vel ordini Et si post huleoi seperal' indorsement' in forma pred' fact' & naticiam inde dat' humoi persons cut hunioi bills sic fuit direct' non solvit denar' suaiam in huilioi bille sive note meneonat' person' cui per ultitnit builioi indorsement fuit fiend' Qd'turic hulnoi mercator sive al' person'cui humoi detier'suffia per huieoi billam sive notam fuit appunctuat' solvend' & qni huilioi prima iedorsament super hurlioi billam sive notam fecerit onerabilis extiterit & a toto tempore cujus warm.' memoria bornina non existit onerabilis & onerat' esse consuevit ad solvend' hulnoi...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Claxton v Swift
...the same indorsee, against the first indorser ò for although the indorsee has recovered damages, he has not received satisfaction.- S. C. 1 Lutw. 878. S. C. Nel. Lut. 270. S. C. 2 Show. 441, 494. S. C. Skin. 255. Yelv. 68. 1 Leon. 19. 3 Leon. 122. Cro. Jac. 73, 284. Latch, 124. Cro. Car. 7......