Clea Shipping Corporation v Bulk Oil International Ltd (No. 2) (Alaskan Trader)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1983
Date1983
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
17 cases
2 firm's commentaries
  • Isabella Ship-owner - v - Shagang Shipping: 'The Aquafaith'
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 17 Mayo 2012
    ...the judge in the present 'Aquafaith' judgment including, inter alia: The Odenfeld [1978] 2 Lloyd's Rep.357 The Alaskan Trader (No.2) [1984] 1 All ER 129 The Dynamic [2003] 2 Lloyd's Rep 693 The The question of law on appeal was: "Whether, as a matter of law, owners were entitled to refuse e......
  • Commercial Court Confirms Principle In White And Carter Applies To A Time Charterparty
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 8 Mayo 2012
    ...to the innocent party is small in comparison to the loss to the contract breaker. The judge also referred to The Alaskan Trader [1984] 1 All ER 129, involving early redelivery by eight months under a two-year time charterparty. Mr Justice Lloyd in that case considered that, whilst there com......
5 books & journal articles
  • CONTRACT DAMAGES AND THE PROMISEE'S ROLE IN ITS OWN LOSS.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 42 No. 2, January 2019
    • 1 Enero 2019
    ...SA v Practitioners in Marketing Ltd [1971] 1 WLR 361, 370 (Salmon LJ), 375 (Sachs LJ); Clea Shipping Corp v Bulk Oil International Ltd [1984] 1 All ER 129, 134, 137 (Lloyd J) ('The Alaskan Trader'); Geys (n 230) 556 [86] (Lord Wilson (233) Tropical Traders Ltd v Goonan (1964) 111 CLR 41, 55......
  • Anticipatory Repudiation
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Contracts. Third Edition Performance and Breach
    • 4 Agosto 2020
    ...Breach” (1984) 47 Mod L Rev 422. 80 [1976] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 250 (CA). See also Clea Shipping Corp v Bulk Oil International Ltd (No 2) , [1984] 1 All ER 129 (QB). 81 Ibid at 255. THE LAW OF CONTR ACTS 766 DAWSON, F. “Metaphors and Anticipatory Breach of Contract” (1981) 40 Cambridge LJ 83. ———.......
  • DEMYSTIFYING THE RIGHT OF ELECTION IN CONTRACT LAW
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2006, December 2006
    • 1 Diciembre 2006
    ...“unreasonable” adds nothing to the test of the general rule that the White & Carter exception applies only in extreme cases. 88 [1983] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 645 at 651. 89 The writer agrees with the analysis of Ewart, supra n 1, eg at pp 25—26. 90 Supra n 1, at pp 6—7. 91 Supra n 18. 92 Supra n 18.......
  • Anticipatory Repudiation
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive The Law of Contracts. Second Edition Performance and breach
    • 29 Agosto 2012
    ...be an adequate remedy. 80 [1976] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 250 (C.A.). See also Clea Shipping Corp . v. Bulk Oil International Ltd. (No. 2) , [1984] 1 All E.R. 129 (Q.B.). 81 Ibid . at 255. Anticipatory Repudiation 709 FURTHER READINGS CARTER, J.W., “The Embiricos Principle and the Law of Anticipatory......
  • Get Started for Free