Clifton v Palumbo
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1944 |
| Year | 1944 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
27 cases
- Deutsche Bank (Malaysia) Bhd v MBF Holdings Bhd
- Diamond Peak Sdn Bhd and Another v DR Tweedie
- Hui Jia Hao v Perdana Park City Sdn Bhd
- Boggess and Another v Badder Hassan
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Contract formation
...where it was common ground that a contract had come into existence, but there was disagreement as to the terms of the contract. 80 [1944] 2 All ER 497 at 499. See also Kwan Siu Man v Yaacov Ozer (1997–1998) 1 HKCFAR 343 at 354–355, per Litton PJ. 58 ContraCt ForMation are excluded from that......
-
Offer and Acceptance
...held to be an offer); Bundy v Johnson (1856), 6 UCCP 221 (“will sell at” held to be an offer). Compare with Clifton v Palumbo , [1944] 2 All ER 497 (CA) (“I . . . am prepared to offer you” a mere invitation to treat). 16 See, for example, Grainger & Son v Gough , [1896] AC 325 (HL) [ Graing......
-
INVITATION TO TREAT
...be an invitation to treat although it contains the word "offer". See Spencer v. Harding (1870) L.R. 5 C.P. 561; Clifton v. Palimbo (1944) 2 All E.R. 497. "Similarly, a statement may be an offer although it is expressed as an acceptance." See: Bigg v. Boyd Gibbins Limited (1971) 1 W.L.R. 913......