Clydesdale Bank Plc v Workman (Ch D)
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 2014 |
Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Clydesdale Bank Plc (Claimant) John Workman and Others (Formerly Trading as Bpe Solicitors, (A Firm)) (Respondents) Shoosmiths (A Firm)(Appellants)
...the proceeds of sale of large parts of the mortgaged property in fraud of the lender. The judge's judgment is at [2013] EWHC B38 (Ch), [2014] PNLR 18. First it is necessary to set out the background facts. 2 Lord Edward Developments (Beechwood) Ltd ("the company") is a development company......
-
Su Ah Tee and others v Allister Lim and Thrumurgan (sued as a firm) and another (William Cheng and others, third parties)
...it and was another reason which warranted a lower amount of contribution. Similarly, in the recent case of Clydesdale Bank Plc v Workman [2014] PNLR 18, the judge also took the view that dishonesty also correlated to a higher contribution from that party who bore 65% of the contribution as ......
-
Cheng William v Allister Lim & Thrumurgan and another and another appeal
...(Nationwide Building Society v Dunlop Haywards Ltd [2010] 1 WLR 258 (“Nationwide Building Society”) and Clydesdale Bank Plc v Workman [2014] PNLR 18 (“Clydesdale Bank”), both discussed in the Judgment at [230]). In passing, we note that it is a well-established principle in contributory neg......
-
Cheng William v Allister Lim & Thrumurgan and another and another appeal
...(Nationwide Building Society v Dunlop Haywards Ltd [2010] 1 WLR 258 (“Nationwide Building Society”) and Clydesdale Bank Plc v Workman [2014] PNLR 18 (“Clydesdale Bank”), both discussed in the Judgment at [230]). In passing, we note that it is a well-established principle in contributory neg......