CM v London Borough of Bexley
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Neutral Citation | [2011] UKUT 215 (AAC) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Date | 2011 |
| Court | Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
CM HS 169 2011
...solid #000000; padding-top:1pt; font-family:'Times New Roman'; font-weight:bold } [2012] AACR 4 (CM v London Borough of Bexley (SEN) [2011] UKUT 215 (AAC)) Judge Ward HS/169/2011 1 June 2011 Special educational provision – naming of school – parental preference – whether general obligation ......
-
London Borough of Croydon v K-A (SEN)
...to reduce the difference between the two. These were straightforward quantifiable calculations. In CM v London Borough of Bexley [2011] UKUT 215 (AAC), the question related to the impact on the public purse where there was an arrangement between two local authorities regarding attendance by......
-
Wendy Haining v Warrington Borough Council
...do so. 20 The authorities were reviewed again by UT Judge Ward sitting in the Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) in CM v London Borough of Bexley [2011] UKUT 215 (AAC). The local authority wished V to attend A school, a maintained school. Her mother preferred B school, which wa......
-
KE v Lancashire County Council
...which is the same as section 39(4)(b)(ii) of the CFA 2014 and bears close similarity to (4)(b)(i). 2 CM v London Borough of Bexley [2011] UKUT 215 (AAC). HS/1340/2017 4 KE v Lancashire County Council (SEN) [2017] UKUT 468 (AAC) pupil under its duties under the Children Act 1989. The ‘holist......
Request a trial to view additional results