Coast Securities No 9 Pty Ltd v Bondoukou Pty Ltd
Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
Judgment Date | 1986 |
Date | 1986 |
Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Public Trustee (Qld) v Fortress Credit Corporation (Aus) 11 Pty Ltd
...Charge by adding a liability which was previously unsecured8. His Honour referred for support to Landers v Schmidt9 and Coast Securities No 9 Pty Ltd v Bondoukou Pty Ltd10. But both decisions turned upon the quite different provision in s 73 of the Property Law Act 1974 (Q) which made it an......
- Bowler v Hilda Pty Ltd
-
Waller v Hargraves Secured Investments Ltd
...to a ‘charge’ underpinned that conclusion. The decision of the Full Court was approved by the Privy Council in Coast Securities No 9 Pty Ltd v Bondoukou Pty Ltd24 which involved the same statutory provisions and a similar fact situation. On the other hand, this Court in Sibbles v Highfern P......
- Sibbles v Highfern Pty Ltd
2 firm's commentaries
-
Octaviar Appeal
...liabilities as secured by the Charge. Holmes JA acknowledged that the case of Coast Securities No. 9 Pty Ltd v Bondoukou Pty Ltd (1986) 69 ALR 385, as relied on in the first instance decision, may tended to support a contrary conclusion but thought that this case should be confined in its a......
-
New Charge Or Variation?
...Justice McMurdo primarily analysed three cases: Landers v Schmidt [1983] 1 Qd R 188; Coast Securities No. 9 Pty Ltd v Bondoukou Pty Ltd (1986) 69 ALR 385; Sibbles v Highfern Pty Ltd (1987) 164 CLR 214. All of these cases considered real property mortgages under the Queensland Property Law A......