Coburn v Colledge

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1897
Date1897
Year1897
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
138 cases
  • Times Newspapers Ltd v Chohan
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 22 June 2001
    ...could not be enforceable until the debt was quantified. 29 Mr Lamacraft sought to rebut that submission using the conclusion reached in Coburn v Colledge (1897) QBD 702. In that case the Court of Appeal concluded that the cause of action accrued when the solicitor did his work even though h......
  • Guannex Leasing Sdn Bhd v Sin Fatt Brothers Construction
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2002
  • Wong Kim Fatt v Yong Kwet Yin
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1996
  • Central Electricity Board v Halifax Corporation
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 1 November 1962
    ...succeed. This depends on what is meant by a cause of action accruing. 12 Both parties founded on the judgment of Lord Esher, M.R. in Coburn v. Colledge [1897] 1 Q.B. 702, and I am content for the purposes of this case to apply the test which he there states. First he quotes (p. 706) a defin......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Payment limitation periods for works and services
    • United Kingdom
    • JD Supra United Kingdom
    • 19 March 2018
    ...that the cause of action arises at the time of completion of the work. The judge considered the leading authority of Coburn v Colledge [1897] 1 QB 702, in which Lord Esher MR stated that in the case of a "who does work for another person at his request on the terms that he is to be paid for......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT