Cocke v Jennor
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1792 |
| Date | 01 January 1792 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
English Reports Citation: 80 E.R. 214
King's Bench Division
[66] 69. cocke versus jennok. W- Trespass. Lit. sect. 376. Ro. 2. Ab. 412. 10 H. 6. 41. b. Release to one trespasser discharged all. 3 Cro. 31. 3 Leo. 122. Co. L. 232. Thomas Coeke brought an action of trespass against Kenelme Jennor for breaking his house at Duumow, and beating him the last day of October, in the tenth year of the King, The defendant pleads, that he together with one Robert Milborne in the time of the trespass supposed, did jointly break the plaintiff's house, and beat him, and that afterwards on the thirteenth day of June 11 Jac. R. the plaintiff7 did release unto the said Milborne by his writing, which the defendant shews in Court, all actions real and personal, &o. and avers, that the trespass, whereof the plaintiff complains, and which he and Milborne did jointly, est una & eadem, and non alia neque diversa. Whereupon the plaintiff demurred, and it was adjudged for the HOBABT.87. LEDSHAM V. ROWE AND MUDGE 215 defendant; for though a trespass be joint, and several to this purpose, that he may sue either one or all, yet when two join in a trespass, they so make one trespasser, as either of them is as...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Iarnnód Éireann v Ireland
...General(1969) 109 I.L.T.R. 69. Chestvale Properties Ltd. v. Glackin [1993] 3 I.R. 35; [1992] I.L.R.M. 221. Cocke v. Jennor (1614) Hob. 66; 80 E.R. 214. Cox v. Ireland [1992] 2 I.R. 503. Crotty v. An Taoiseach [1987] I.R. 713; [1987] I.L.R.M. 400. Davies v. Swan Motor Co. (Swansea) Ltd. [194......
-
Gardiner v Moore
... ... The case of Cocke v. Jennor F11 is distinct upon the point, and there are many subsequent cases to the same effect.’ The letter of February 19, 1959, states that it ... ...
- Thompson v Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd
-
Development Bank of St. Kitts and Nevis v Browne, Walwyn-bowrin and Morris
...a part of the debt, to seek any form of contribution from any remaining joint and several debtors. See also Cocke v. Jennor (1614) Hob 66; 80 ER 214 and Duck Mayeu [1892] 2 Q.B. 511 at 513. The latter case is an example when the court has examined the document closely to decide whether it ......