Codrington v Codrington
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1865 |
| Date | 1865 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Lemos v Coutts (Cayman) Ltd
...[1952] Ch. 197. (6) Castanho v. Brown & Root (U.K.) Ltd., [1981] A.C. 557; [1981] 1 All E.R. 143. (7) Codrington v. CodringtonELR(1875), L.R. 7 H.L. 854, dicta of Lord Cairns applied. (8) Cowin, In re, Cowin v. GravettELR(1886), 33 Ch. D. 179; 56 L.J. Ch. 78, dictum of North J. applied. (9)......
-
Mpb v Lgk
...and reprobate the decision of an adjudicator. He cannot “blow hot and cold” about whether it is valid. 53 In Codrington v Codrington [1875] LR 7 HL 854 at 866, Lord Chelmsford referred to the doctrine in these terms: “He who accepts a benefit under an instrument must adopt the whole of it, ......
-
Linnett v Halliwells LLP [QBD (TCC)]
...reprobating” or “blowing hot and cold” in relation to the validity of an adjudicator's decision. The law on election is set out in Codrington v. Codrington [1875] LR 7 HL 854 at 866 per Lord Chelmsford; Banque des Marchands v. Kindersley [1951] 1 Ch 112 and Lissenden v. CAV Bosch Limited [1......
- Hudson v Gray
Request a trial to view additional results