Coflexip SA and Another v Stolt Comex Seaway MS Ltd and Others
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 2000 |
| Date | 2000 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
31 cases
- Welcome Real-Time Sa v Catuity Inc. (No 2)
-
Regen Lab SA v Estar Medical Ltd
...another (Children) [2013] UKSC 8; [2013] 1 WLR 634, Charlesworth v Relay Roads Ltd [2000] RPC 300, Coflexip SA v Stolt Comex Seaway MS Ltd [2001] RPC 9 (CA) and Swain v Hillman [2001] 1 All ER 91 (CA). He said: “[38] I can summarise the principles in this way. The court has a jurisdiction,......
-
Dyson Technology Ltd v Samsung Gwangju Electronics
...that there are two simple answers to it. 91 The first is that the word “for” in a patent claim means “suitable for”: see Coflexip SA v Stolt Comex Seaway MS Ltd [2000] EWCA Civ 242, [2000] IP&T 1332 at [23]-[27]. Accordingly '603 claims a vacuum cleaner in which the three dust separation un......
-
Interflora, Inc. and Another v Marks and Spencer Plc and Another
...a more specific injunction. By contrast, counsel for M & S resisted the grant of an injunction in conventional form. 15 In Coflexip SA v Stolt Comex Seaway MS Ltd [1999] FSR 473 Laddie J held in a patent case that the injunction to restrain infringement should specify the particular acts r......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Patent Protection for Chinese Herbal Medicine Product Invention in Taiwan
...Anilin & Soda Fabrik 111 US 293, 311–12 (1884).21 In re Merz 97 F.2d 599, 601 (CCPA1938).22 BASF AG v Bureau voor de Industrie¨le Eigendom [2001] RPC 9.23 In re Merz, 97 F.2d 599, 601 (CCPA1938).24 Personal conversation with Prof. Dr Wu from the Institute of Biomedicine at NationalYang Ming......