Coflexip SA v Stolt Offshore MS Ltd (No 3)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
| Date | 2004 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 cases
-
Special Effects Ltd v L'Oréal SA
... was followed by the Court of Appeal (by a majority: Peter Gibson LJ and Sir Martin Nourse, Neuberger LJ dissenting) in Coflexip SA v Stolt Offshore MS Ltd (No 2) [2004] EWCA Civ 213, where the later proceedings had been brought by a third party. The Defendant in the first proceedings was h......
-
Unilin Beheer BV v Berry Floor NV
...and policy 39 There are two important decisions of this Court, Poulton v Adjustable Cover [1908] 2 Ch 430 and Coflexip v Stolt (No 2) [2004] FSR 34. In Poulton the patentees had successfully sued the defendants for patent infringement, the court holding the patent to be valid and infringed.......
-
Adobe Systems Inc. v Netcom Online.Company uk Ltd
...by the pleadings in the context of intellectual property. 29 In the context of a patent action, it is, as the majority in Coflexip SA v Stolt Offshore MS Ltd (No 2) [2004] EWCA Civ 213, [2004] FSR 34 observed at [152], the usual and convenient practice of the Patents Court to include in a......
-
Hormel Foods Corporation v Antilles Landscape Investments NV
...In any event it is distinguishable from the present situation. 62 In Coflexip SA v Solt Offshore MS Ltd (No 2) [2004] EWCA Civ 213, [2004] FSR 34 the claimants had sued the defendants for infringement of a patent. The defendants counterclaimed for revocation. Laddie J held that the patent ......
Request a trial to view additional results