Coflexip SA v Stolt Offshore MS Ltd (No 3)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2004 |
| Year | 2004 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
14 cases
-
Special Effects Ltd v L'Oréal SA
... was followed by the Court of Appeal (by a majority: Peter Gibson LJ and Sir Martin Nourse, Neuberger LJ dissenting) in Coflexip SA v Stolt Offshore MS Ltd (No 2) [2004] EWCA Civ 213, where the later proceedings had been brought by a third party. The Defendant in the first proceedings was h......
-
Samsung Electronics Company Ltd (Appellant/Claimant) v Apple Retail UK Ltd and Another (Respondents/Defendants)
...and, in so doing, regarded itself as bound by its earlier decisions in Coflexip SA v Stolt Offshore MS Ltd (No 2) [2004] EWCA Civ 213, [2004] FSR 34 and Unilin Beheer BV v Berry Floor NV [2007] EWCA Civ 364, [2007] FSR 25. 31 The Supreme Court reversed that decision and allowed the appeal ......
-
Hormel Foods Corporation v Antilles Landscape Investments NV
...In any event it is distinguishable from the present situation. 62 In Coflexip SA v Solt Offshore MS Ltd (No 2) [2004] EWCA Civ 213, [2004] FSR 34 the claimants had sued the defendants for infringement of a patent. The defendants counterclaimed for revocation. Laddie J held that the patent ......
-
Adobe Systems Inc. v Netcom Online.Company uk Ltd
...by the pleadings in the context of intellectual property. 29 In the context of a patent action, it is, as the majority in Coflexip SA v Stolt Offshore MS Ltd (No 2) [2004] EWCA Civ 213, [2004] FSR 34 observed at [152], the usual and convenient practice of the Patents Court to include in a......
Request a trial to view additional results