Cole v Rose
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1978 |
| Date | 1978 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
J.T.M. Construction and Equipment Ltd v Circle B Farms Ltd
...contract. A protracted delay means delay for an unreasonably long time. This is a question of fact to be decided in all the circumstances: Cole v Rose [1978] 3 ALL ER 1121. 46 Although it cannot be said that time was originally of the essence, the defendant had, however, served a notice to......
-
Midill (97PL) Ltd v Park Lane Estates Ltd and another
...and the second is not really significant because the contract was concluded before then by the letter of acceptance….” (p 424–5) 38 In Cole v Rose [1978] 3 All ER 1121, where the vendor had purported to rescind the contract and retain the deposit, while selling to another purchaser at a hig......
-
Vacciana v Oxford Prudential Holdings
...that the vendor was not “able, ready and willing” since the court would not force the purchaser to buy a lawsuit. 112 The later case of Cole v. Rose [1978] 3 ALL E.R. 1121 shows a refinement of the principles governing “readiness”. There the property for sale was subject to three charges bu......
-
Midill (97PL) Ltd v Park Lane Estates Ltd and another
...the period but with a failure to complete within that period at all. Midill also relied upon the decision of Mr Mervyn Davies QC in Cole –v– Rose [1978] 3 All E R 1121 where a solicitor had not obtained confirmation that entries in the search certificate related to charges of which he was a......
Request a trial to view additional results