Coleman v Coleman
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1972 |
| Year | 1972 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
BT v CU
...contrast to a single sum which, in order to soften the blow to the payer, is permitted to be paid in instalments.74 In Coleman v Coleman [1973] Fam 10, Sir George Baker P considered these provisions. The husband had been ordered to pay the wife a lump sum of £2,000. In addition, there was a......
-
Hannelore De Lasala v Ernest Ferdinand Perez De Lasala
...(N.S.W.) 1 (12) (1965) P.266 (13) (1940) P.124 (14) (1969) 2 All E.R. 463 (15) (1970) 1 All E.R. 244 (16) (1970) 1 W.L.R. 1219 (17) (1973) Fam.10 (18) (1971) p.340 (19) (1879) 5 App. Cas.342 (20) (1927) A.C.515 (21) (1965) H.K.L.R. 815 (22) (1973) FAM.72 (23) (1973) FAM.134 (24) (1971) FAM.......
-
Hamilton v Hamilton
...payment of it is due." 21 In general, the court may only make capital orders on one occasion. This principle was first enunciated in Coleman v Coleman [1973] Fam 10, where Sir George Baker P held that the words 'on granting a decree … or at any time thereafter' in what is now s 23 of the 19......
-
Ch v Meh
...court to grant a ‘lump sum or sums’ does not create any exception to the rule that only one application can be made : Coleman v Coleman [1973] Fam 10, [1972] 3 All ER 886, as per Sir George Baker P. Those words simply give the court the power to award one or more sums within the ambit of a ......
Request a trial to view additional results