Coles v Odhams Press Ltd
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1936 |
Year | 1936 |
Court | King's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
19 cases
-
Treasure Bay (St Lucia) Ltd Claimant v [1] The Gaming Authority [2] The Cabinet of Saint Lucia [3] The National Lotteries Authority [4] The Minister for Social Transformation Youth and Sports Respondents Cage St. Lucia Ltd Interested Party [ECSC]
...if chance predominates, the game is a lottery. For this he relies on Scott v Director of Public Prosecutions [1914–15] All ER Rep 825; Coles v Odhams [1935] All ER Rep 598; Moore v Elphick [1945] 2 All ER 155; Boucher v Rowsell [1947] 1 All ER 870; Stoute v DaCosta & Co. (1964) 8 WIR 13; Th......
-
Treasure Bay (St. Lucia) Ltd v Gaming Authority et Al
...if chance predominates, the game is a lottery. For this he relies on Scott v. Director of Public Prosecutions [1914–15] All ER Rep 825; Coles v. Odhams [1935] All ER Rep 598; Moore v. Elphick [1945] 2 All ER 155; Boucher v. Rowsell [1947] 1 All ER 870; Stoute v. DaCosta & Co. (1964) 8 W.I.R......
-
AP v Minister for Justice and Equality
...by Lord Bingham in R. (Roberts) v. Parole Board [2005] 2 A.C. 738, at p. 754 (quoting Lord Hewart L.C.J. in Coles v. Odhams Press Ltd. [1936] 1 K.B. 416) as taking blind shots at a hidden target. On the other hand, concerns have been expressed that the very availability of the procedure h......
-
R Immigration Law Practitioners, Association v Tribunal Procedure Committee and Another
...I regard these observations as amply justified. In the vivid language used by Lord Hewart CJ in a very different context in Coles v Odhams Press Ltd [1936] 1 KB 416, 426, the specially-appointed advocate would inevitably be "taking blind shots at a hidden target". 43 He nevertheless recogn......
Request a trial to view additional results