Coleshill v Manchester Corporation

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1928
Date1928
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
30 cases
  • Hawkins v Coulsdon and Purley Urban District Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 17 December 1953
    ...observations were not only approved but accepted as a guide by Lord Justice Atkin in ( Coleshill v. Manchester Corporation 1928, 1 King's Bench, 776, at page 792). It is not easy to perceive how a licensor can "intentionally" set a trap for a licensee if he does not know that the state of a......
  • Goh Choon Moi; Ling Hock Tee
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1965
  • High-Crest Enterprises Limited c. Canada,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • 28 April 2017
    ...809, 8 C.C.C. (2d) 188; Clarke v. Trask (1901), 1 O.L.R. 207, [1901] O.J. No. 42 (QL) (H.C.J.); Coleshill v. Manches ter Corporation, [1928] 1 K.B. 776, 97 L.J.K.B. 229 (C.A.); Re Application of British Reinforced Concrete Engineering Co. Limited (1929), 45 T.L.R. 186, 20 Ry. & Can. Tr.......
  • Sazali Salleh v Public Prosecutor
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2004
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Case Note
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2013, December 2013
    • 1 December 2013
    ...v Downton(1897) 2 QB 571 or Bird v Holbrook(1828) 4 Bing 628; 130 ER 911. 16(1883) 11 QBD 503. 17 See Coleshill v Manchester Corp[1928] 1 KB 776 at 791, cited in Max C Atkinson, “Occupier's Liability Law”(1968–1970) 3 University of Tasmania Law Review 82 at 83. See also the views of Dixon J......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT