Colomore v Hobs
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1662 |
| Date | 01 January 1662 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
English Reports Citation: 82 E.R. 311
King's Bench Division
COLOMORE versus hobs. Le plaintiff en replevin en le C. B. ad judgement: & un breve d'enquiry de damages issuist, & le defendant port un breve d'error, donq^ le breve d'enquiry fuit ret en le C. B. & judgement la done, & le plaintiff, en le C. B. move icy, que il poit proceder al execution, & issint il proceed. Nota, per Broome. Cevest le course, quand error est port sur un interlocutory judgement (viz.) d'aver un rule del Court icy de proceed, an le Inferior Court nient obstant le breve d'error. Apr c le breve d'error fuit return en le B. R. & ambideux judgements (viz.) tout le record remove. Ore le defendant en le Common Bane, port icy novel breve. Doderidge dit, que le breve d'error bien git avant judgement done, quia les parols sont, si judicium inde...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Crowley and Others v Vitty
...authoiities on the subject ate leviewed in Smith's Lead Gas vol 11 p 459 a, where reference is made to a case of Ot'eagh v Blood (3 Jones & Lat 133), in which Su E Sugden, C, after expressing a (a) That section enacts, "'lhat when and so soon as the tenu and interest of the tenant of any ho......
-
Lambert v M'Donnell
...LAMBERT and M'DONNELL. Creagh v. BloodENR 1 Jon. & Lat. 133. Crowley v. VittyENR 7 Exch. 319. Foquet v. MooreENR 7 Exch. 870. The Earl of Egremont v. Courtenay 11 Q. B. 702. Lynch v. Lynch 6 Ir. Law Rep. 131. Gybson v. SearlENR Cro. Jac. 177. Earl of Arundel v. Lord Gray Dyer, 200, pl. 62. ......
-
The King against the Chancellor, Masters, and Scholars of the University of Cambridge
...alleged, these depositions were upon oath, and the word depositions doea not import ex vi termini, that they were upon oath. 3 Irist. 167. Latch, 133. If in case of an indictment it should be juratores deponunt, it would be ill. 2. It ought to appear, before whom the oath was taken, and tha......
-
Allen v Aldworth
...ALLEN and ALDWORTH. Dixon v. ClarkeENR 5 C. B. 365. Cullen v. LeonardUNK 5 Ir. Eq. Rep. 134. Creagh v. BloodENRUNK 3 Jo. & Lat. 133; S. C., 8 Ir. Eq. Rep. 688. 1862. Chancery. NUNN V. DONOVAN. Judgment. 190 CHANCERY REPORTS. was, I have no doubt that he intended Mrs. Donovan. to have one mo......