Commerce and Industry Insurance Company of Canada and another v Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London and another
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | Moore-Bick J. |
| Judgment Date | 01 August 2001 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court) |
| Date | 01 August 2001 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
A and B v C, D and E (Taking evidence for a foreign seated arbitration)
...review of the authorities, the position was more complex. 8 He considered first the decision of Moore-Bick J in Commerce and Industry Insurance v Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's [2002] 1 WLR 1323, the only authority specifically concerned with section 44(2)(a). There the arbitration tribun......
-
Allergan, Inc. v Amazon Medica
...a concern about being sued is not a sufficient reason for not providing evidence. As explained by Moore-Bick J in Commerce and Industry Insurance Co v Lloyds Underwriters [2002] 1 WLR 1323 at 1331: “In the ordinary way, unless he can invoke one of the recognised grounds of privilege, a per......
-
Dtek Trading S.A. v Mr Sergey Morozov and Another
...to assist arbitrations based (for example) in New York, as in Commerce and Industry Insurance Co of Canada v Lloyds Underwriters [2002] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 219. 54 Finally they submit that ultimately, whether or not the Court should be making orders against non-parties to arbitrations, particula......
-
A v C
...13 However, any discussion of this issue must begin with Commerce and Industry Insurance Co of Canada v Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's [2002] 1 WLR 1323. As Ms Rosen Peacocke pointed out, this is the only case which was specifically concerned with an application under s.44(2)(a) for the t......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
Compelling Witness Testimony Under The 1996 Arbitration Act
...of the foreign seat does not make it inappropriate to do so. Commerce and Industry Insurance Co of Canada v Lloyd's Underwriters [2002] 1 Lloyds Rep 219, sets out the test for situations where such an order is The case concerned applications to set aside a "without notice" application in a ......
-
Compelled to Testify: Court of Appeal Confirms Power to Order Non Party Witness to Give Evidence in a New York-Seated Arbitration
...conclusion by the fact the same decision was reached in Commercial & Industry Insurance Co of Canada v Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's [2002] 1 WLR 1323, which is the only decision at first instance which directly deals with the question as to whether the Court can make an order under Secti......
1 books & journal articles
-
Chapter XIII. United Kingdom
...Northern Irish courts. 6. 1975 Act, supra note 4, at § 1(a). 7. Id. at § 1(b). 8. Viking Insurance Co. v. Rossdale and Ducking , [2002] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 219 (Q.B. Comm. 2001) (New York arbitration). 234 Obtaining Discovery Abroad English High Court, therefore, may not give effect to letters o......